Validating attitude measures in counseling research: An attitude-argument consistency approach.
James R. Friedrich, Jennifer M. Verive
Abstract
James R. Friedrich, Jennifer M. Verive
Abstract
On the basis of recent social psychological research in the area of attitude formation and change, including Petty and Cacioppo's (1986) Elaboration Likelihood Model of persuasion, a strategy is proposed and tested for validating self-report attitude measures in counseling research. Data obtained from a college student sample indicated that attitude measures correlate with the proportion of attitude-consistent arguments generated and retrieved from memory
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
On the basis of recent social psychological research in the area of attitude formation and change, including Petty and Cacioppo's (1986) Elaboration Likelihood Model of persuasion, a strategy is proposed and tested for validating self-report attitude measures in counseling research. Data obtained from a college student sample indicated that attitude measures correlate with the proportion of attitude-consistent arguments generated and retrieved from memory
Key concepts: Elaboration likelihood model, Psychology, Persuasion, Attitude change, Consistency (knowledge bases), Attitude, Social psychology, Argument (complex analysis)