In-vitro activity of ceftizoxime against anaerobic bacteria and comparison with other cephalosporins
Anthony W. Chow, S M Finegold
Abstract
Anthony W. Chow, S M Finegold
Abstract
The in-vitro activity of ceftizoxime against anaerobic bacteria, especially Bacteroides fragilis , is reviewed, based on our own experience as well as on other sources. In-vitro data on ceftizoxime and other cephalosporins and related β-lactam antibiotics against more than 500 clinical isolates of anaerobic bacteria (as determined by the NCCLS reference method) were compared at Vancouver General Hospital. Ceftizoxime exhibited excellent in-vitro activity against all anaerobes, including Bact. fragilis , when tested by the NCCLS reference method, and was comparable in activity to cefoxitin and cefotaxime. However, marked variation in susceptibility results was noted against Bact. fragilis and the Bact. fragilis group, primarily related to the size of inoculum and type of media utilized in the different studies. With the supplemented brucella agar technique, ceftizoxime was distinctly less active against the Bact. fragilis group. These data underscore the importance of standardized techniques for in-vitro susceptibility testing of anaerobes. Further in-vitro and clinical studies are clearly indicated.
OpenAlex reports 29 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The in-vitro activity of ceftizoxime against anaerobic bacteria, especially Bacteroides fragilis , is reviewed, based on our own experience as well as on other sources. In-vitro data on ceftizoxime and other cephalosporins and related β-lactam antibiotics against more than 500 clinical isolates of anaerobic bacteria (as determined by the NCCLS reference method) were compared at Vancouver General Hospital. Ceftizoxime exhibited excellent in-vitro activity against all anaerobes, including Bact. fragilis , when tested by the NCCLS reference method, and was comparable in activity to cefoxitin and cefotaxime. However, marked variation in susceptibility results was noted against Bact. fragilis and the Bact. fragilis group, primarily related to the size of inoculum and type of media utilized in the different studies. With the supplemented brucella agar technique, ceftizoxime was distinctly less active against the Bact. fragilis group. These data underscore the importance of standardized techniques for in-vitro susceptibility testing of anaerobes. Further in-vitro and clinical studies are clearly indicated.
Key concepts: Ceftizoxime, Bacteroides fragilis, Cefoxitin, Microbiology, Anaerobic bacteria, Cephalosporin, Cefotaxime, Antibiotics