1960JAMARequires access

PERCUSSION OF THE STERNUM

William W. Dressler

Open publisher page 11 citations

Abstract

The relative advantages of percussion and of single roentgenograms were studied in 32 cases of pericardial effusion. The diagnosis was established by actual demonstration of the presence of effusion fluid by paracentesis, biopsy, autopsy, or serial roentgenograms. The single roentgenogram gave the correct diagnosis in only 13% (4 of 32 cases), but percussion gave the correct diagnosis in 58% (17 of the 29 cases in which adequate records were available). The most reliable sign was a flat percussion sound over the lower half of the sternum; flat percussion sounds in the left third intercostal space adjacent to the sternum and on the right extending from the sternum between the third and sixth ribs were also often observed in this condition. The procedure of percussion can be simplified by fixing attention on areas of flat percussion sounds and disregarding intermediate degrees of dulness.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The relative advantages of percussion and of single roentgenograms were studied in 32 cases of pericardial effusion. The diagnosis was established by actual demonstration of the presence of effusion fluid by paracentesis, biopsy, autopsy, or serial roentgenograms. The single roentgenogram gave the correct diagnosis in only 13% (4 of 32 cases), but percussion gave the correct diagnosis in 58% (17 of the 29 cases in which adequate records were available). The most reliable sign was a flat percussion sound over the lower half of the sternum; flat percussion sounds in the left third intercostal space adjacent to the sternum and on the right extending from the sternum between the third and sixth ribs were also often observed in this condition. The procedure of percussion can be simplified by fixing attention on areas of flat percussion sounds and disregarding intermediate degrees of dulness.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The relative advantages of percussion and of single roentgenograms were studied in 32 cases of pericardial effusion. The diagnosis was established by actual demonstration of the presence of effusion fluid by paracentesis, biopsy, autopsy, or serial roentgenograms. The single roentgenogram gave the correct diagnosis in only 13% (4 of 32 cases), but percussion gave the correct diagnosis in 58% (17 of the 29 cases in which adequate records were available). The most reliable sign was a flat percussion sound over the lower half of the sternum; flat percussion sounds in the left third intercostal space adjacent to the sternum and on the right extending from the sternum between the third and sixth ribs were also often observed in this condition. The procedure of percussion can be simplified by fixing attention on areas of flat percussion sounds and disregarding intermediate degrees of dulness.

Key concepts: Percussion, Sternum, Medicine, Rib cage, Anatomy, Sound (geography), Surgery, Radiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
PERCUSSION OF THE STERNUM — Research Paper | ScholarLens