1996Human ReproductionRequires access

Fertilization and early embryology: Comparison of mouse embryo development in open and microdrop co-culture systems

R. Sherbahn, Jonna Frasor, Ewa Radwańska, Zvi Binor, Mary Wood-Molo, M. Hibner, S. R. Mack, Richard G. Rawlins

Open publisher page 13 citations

Abstract

Co-culture with numerous cell lines has been shown to improve in-vitro embryo development. It is usually performed in open culture without an oil overlay, or in relatively large volumes of medium (e.g. 0.5 ml) under oil. We compared the efficacy of open and microdrop co-culture systems using human endometrial and tubal cell lines and mouse zygotes. Although the mean pH values of the media from the tubal cell cultures (both open and oil-covered) decreased significantly over 5 days of culture, this did not appear to impair embryo development. Both co-culture and microdrop culture significantly improved blastocyst and hatching blastocyst formation rates. The combination of the two techniques (microdrop and co-culture) demonstrated the highest blastocyst formation and hatching blastocyst formation rates, as well as the highest mean cell numbers in hatching blastocysts. Co-culture in a microdrop is a superior system for mouse embryo culture.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Co-culture with numerous cell lines has been shown to improve in-vitro embryo development. It is usually performed in open culture without an oil overlay, or in relatively large volumes of medium (e.g. 0.5 ml) under oil. We compared the efficacy of open and microdrop co-culture systems using human endometrial and tubal cell lines and mouse zygotes. Although the mean pH values of the media from the tubal cell cultures (both open and oil-covered) decreased significantly over 5 days of culture, this did not appear to impair embryo development. Both co-culture and microdrop culture significantly improved blastocyst and hatching blastocyst formation rates. The combination of the two techniques (microdrop and co-culture) demonstrated the highest blastocyst formation and hatching blastocyst formation rates, as well as the highest mean cell numbers in hatching blastocysts. Co-culture in a microdrop is a superior system for mouse embryo culture.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Co-culture with numerous cell lines has been shown to improve in-vitro embryo development. It is usually performed in open culture without an oil overlay, or in relatively large volumes of medium (e.g. 0.5 ml) under oil. We compared the efficacy of open and microdrop co-culture systems using human endometrial and tubal cell lines and mouse zygotes. Although the mean pH values of the media from the tubal cell cultures (both open and oil-covered) decreased significantly over 5 days of culture, this did not appear to impair embryo development. Both co-culture and microdrop culture significantly improved blastocyst and hatching blastocyst formation rates. The combination of the two techniques (microdrop and co-culture) demonstrated the highest blastocyst formation and hatching blastocyst formation rates, as well as the highest mean cell numbers in hatching blastocysts. Co-culture in a microdrop is a superior system for mouse embryo culture.

Key concepts: Blastocyst, Hatching, Embryo, Embryo culture, Andrology, Zygote, Biology, Human fertilization

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Fertilization and early embryology: Comparison of mouse embryo development in open and microdrop co-culture systems — Research Paper | ScholarLens