1990•College & Research LibrariesOpen access

ARL Libraries and Staff Development: A Suggested Model for Success

Patricia Weaver-Meyers

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

tion, and Maintenance Model (RPTIM) is described. Concepts in the model are related to a broad overview of current staff development and continuing education efforts in academic li-braries. Results of a survey of staff developers in ARL libraries suggest that 80 percent of the model describes practices appropriate to the academic/research library setting. In addition, re-spondents indicated that existing staff development programs generally did not meet the crite-ria staff developers agreed should be part of their libraries ' program. ffective continuing education and staff development pro-grams in libraries are becoming more pressing needs as fast-paced change remains with us. Sheila Creth identifies continuing education as a priority and exhorts academic librarians to assess critically the degree of support con-tinuing education receives from library administrators. 1 This study examines

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

tion, and Maintenance Model (RPTIM) is described. Concepts in the model are related to a broad overview of current staff development and continuing education efforts in academic li-braries. Results of a survey of staff developers in ARL libraries suggest that 80 percent of the model describes practices appropriate to the academic/research library setting. In addition, re-spondents indicated that existing staff development programs generally did not meet the crite-ria staff developers agreed should be part of their libraries ' program. ffective continuing education and staff development pro-grams in libraries are becoming more pressing needs as fast-paced change remains with us. Sheila Creth identifies continuing education as a priority and exhorts academic librarians to assess critically the degree of support con-tinuing education receives from library administrators. 1 This study examines

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

tion, and Maintenance Model (RPTIM) is described. Concepts in the model are related to a broad overview of current staff development and continuing education efforts in academic li-braries. Results of a survey of staff developers in ARL libraries suggest that 80 percent of the model describes practices appropriate to the academic/research library setting. In addition, re-spondents indicated that existing staff development programs generally did not meet the crite-ria staff developers agreed should be part of their libraries ' program. ffective continuing education and staff development pro-grams in libraries are becoming more pressing needs as fast-paced change remains with us. Sheila Creth identifies continuing education as a priority and exhorts academic librarians to assess critically the degree of support con-tinuing education receives from library administrators. 1 This study examines

Key concepts: Computer science, Staff management, Professional development, Process management, Knowledge management, World Wide Web, Psychology, Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
ARL Libraries and Staff Development: A Suggested Model for Success — Research Paper | ScholarLens