ARL Libraries and Staff Development: A Suggested Model for Success
Patricia Weaver-Meyers
Abstract
Open-access reader
Patricia Weaver-Meyers
Abstract
Open-access reader
tion, and Maintenance Model (RPTIM) is described. Concepts in the model are related to a broad overview of current staff development and continuing education efforts in academic li-braries. Results of a survey of staff developers in ARL libraries suggest that 80 percent of the model describes practices appropriate to the academic/research library setting. In addition, re-spondents indicated that existing staff development programs generally did not meet the crite-ria staff developers agreed should be part of their libraries ' program. ffective continuing education and staff development pro-grams in libraries are becoming more pressing needs as fast-paced change remains with us. Sheila Creth identifies continuing education as a priority and exhorts academic librarians to assess critically the degree of support con-tinuing education receives from library administrators. 1 This study examines
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
tion, and Maintenance Model (RPTIM) is described. Concepts in the model are related to a broad overview of current staff development and continuing education efforts in academic li-braries. Results of a survey of staff developers in ARL libraries suggest that 80 percent of the model describes practices appropriate to the academic/research library setting. In addition, re-spondents indicated that existing staff development programs generally did not meet the crite-ria staff developers agreed should be part of their libraries ' program. ffective continuing education and staff development pro-grams in libraries are becoming more pressing needs as fast-paced change remains with us. Sheila Creth identifies continuing education as a priority and exhorts academic librarians to assess critically the degree of support con-tinuing education receives from library administrators. 1 This study examines
Key concepts: Computer science, Staff management, Professional development, Process management, Knowledge management, World Wide Web, Psychology, Business