2012British journal of surgeryOpen access

Randomized clinical trial of bilateral subtotal thyroidectomy versus total thyroidectomy for Graves' disease with a 5-year follow-up (Br J Surg 2012; 99: 515–522)

Pankaj Kumar Garg

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Sir I read this original article with great interest. The authors have used two primary outcomes in the trial, the prevalence of recurrent hyperthyroidism and changes in Graves' ophthalmopathy. They concluded that total thyroidectomy prevented recurrent hyperthyroidism (P = 0·002), but did not prevent progression of the Graves' ophthalmopathy (P = 0.586). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assess outcomes for which the interventions are being compared. There can be several outcomes in an RCT and these are divided into two types: primary and secondary. A primary outcome is the most important prespecified endpoint used to reach a decision regarding the overall result of the trial. It also serves as the basis for calculation of the sample size for a particular RCT. All other outcomes are considered secondary. So, a RCT must have only one primary outcome, which should be disclosed explicitly at the beginning of the trial1.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Sir I read this original article with great interest. The authors have used two primary outcomes in the trial, the prevalence of recurrent hyperthyroidism and changes in Graves' ophthalmopathy. They concluded that total thyroidectomy prevented recurrent hyperthyroidism (P = 0·002), but did not prevent progression of the Graves' ophthalmopathy (P = 0.586). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assess outcomes for which the interventions are being compared. There can be several outcomes in an RCT and these are divided into two types: primary and secondary. A primary outcome is the most important prespecified endpoint used to reach a decision regarding the overall result of the trial. It also serves as the basis for calculation of the sample size for a particular RCT. All other outcomes are considered secondary. So, a RCT must have only one primary outcome, which should be disclosed explicitly at the beginning of the trial1.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Sir I read this original article with great interest. The authors have used two primary outcomes in the trial, the prevalence of recurrent hyperthyroidism and changes in Graves' ophthalmopathy. They concluded that total thyroidectomy prevented recurrent hyperthyroidism (P = 0·002), but did not prevent progression of the Graves' ophthalmopathy (P = 0.586). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assess outcomes for which the interventions are being compared. There can be several outcomes in an RCT and these are divided into two types: primary and secondary. A primary outcome is the most important prespecified endpoint used to reach a decision regarding the overall result of the trial. It also serves as the basis for calculation of the sample size for a particular RCT. All other outcomes are considered secondary. So, a RCT must have only one primary outcome, which should be disclosed explicitly at the beginning of the trial1.

Key concepts: Medicine, Thyroidectomy, Surgery, Total thyroidectomy, Subtotal thyroidectomy, Randomized controlled trial, Graves' disease, Disease

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Randomized clinical trial of bilateral subtotal thyroidectomy versus total thyroidectomy for Graves' disease with a 5-year follow-up (Br J Surg 2012; 99: 515–522) — Research Paper | ScholarLens