2004Australian ForestryRequires access

Effects of thinning and coppice control on stand productivity and structure in a silvertop ash (Eucalyptus sieberiL. Johnson) forest

M.J. Connell, R. J. Raison, P. D. Jenkins

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

Summary The effects of commercial thinning on stand structure and productivity were investigated in a 28-y-old stand of silvertop ash (Eucalyptus sieberi) near Orbost, Victoria. Thinning reduced basal area by 40–50% in treated areas and stocking from about 1400 to 250 merchantable stems ha-1. Replicated experimental plots were established in unthinned, thinned-only, and thinned and coppice-treated forest to measure the effects of thinning and coppice competition on the growth of retained trees. Stand basal area increments averaged 1.76 m2 ha-1 y-1 and thinning did not significantly reduce stand basal area increment even in the first year after treatment. Over the 6 y of measurement, the relative basal area growth in thinned-only forest was 47–67% higher than in unthinned forest, and in thinned and coppice-treated forest basal area increases were 60–89% greater than in unthinned (a further 15–23% over thinned-only). Basal area increment for the potential sawlog trees (the largest 150 stems ha-1) in thinned-only forest exceeded basal area increment of potential sawlogs in unthinned forest by 40–60%. In forest where coppice competition was removed, growth rates were increased by a further 15–20% in all years. Smaller trees retained in thinned forest (potential pulpwood for a second thinning) grew 69% faster than similarly-sized trees in unthinned forest, and removal of coppice competition increased this response by a further 38%. Competition from coppice regeneration developing on cut stumps reduced potential basal area growth of retained trees by about 20% in all years following thinning. Coppice contributed extra basal area to the stand (from 0.7 m2 ha-1 y-1 in the first year after thinning to 1.3 m1 ha-1 y-1 in the sixth year). After 6 y, coppice regeneration from cut stumps persisted in thinned-only forest (but declined from 1100 to 500 coppice stems ha-1) and contributed about 16% of total basal area, but less than 1% in volume.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Summary The effects of commercial thinning on stand structure and productivity were investigated in a 28-y-old stand of silvertop ash (Eucalyptus sieberi) near Orbost, Victoria. Thinning reduced basal area by 40–50% in treated areas and stocking from about 1400 to 250 merchantable stems ha-1. Replicated experimental plots were established in unthinned, thinned-only, and thinned and coppice-treated forest to measure the effects of thinning and coppice competition on the growth of retained trees. Stand basal area increments averaged 1.76 m2 ha-1 y-1 and thinning did not significantly reduce stand basal area increment even in the first year after treatment. Over the 6 y of measurement, the relative basal area growth in thinned-only forest was 47–67% higher than in unthinned forest, and in thinned and coppice-treated forest basal area increases were 60–89% greater than in unthinned (a further 15–23% over thinned-only). Basal area increment for the potential sawlog trees (the largest 150 stems ha-1) in thinned-only forest exceeded basal area increment of potential sawlogs in unthinned forest by 40–60%. In forest where coppice competition was removed, growth rates were increased by a further 15–20% in all years. Smaller trees retained in thinned forest (potential pulpwood for a second thinning) grew 69% faster than similarly-sized trees in unthinned forest, and removal of coppice competition increased this response by a further 38%. Competition from coppice regeneration developing on cut stumps reduced potential basal area growth of retained trees by about 20% in all years following thinning. Coppice contributed extra basal area to the stand (from 0.7 m2 ha-1 y-1 in the first year after thinning to 1.3 m1 ha-1 y-1 in the sixth year). After 6 y, coppice regeneration from cut stumps persisted in thinned-only forest (but declined from 1100 to 500 coppice stems ha-1) and contributed about 16% of total basal area, but less than 1% in volume.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Summary The effects of commercial thinning on stand structure and productivity were investigated in a 28-y-old stand of silvertop ash (Eucalyptus sieberi) near Orbost, Victoria. Thinning reduced basal area by 40–50% in treated areas and stocking from about 1400 to 250 merchantable stems ha-1. Replicated experimental plots were established in unthinned, thinned-only, and thinned and coppice-treated forest to measure the effects of thinning and coppice competition on the growth of retained trees. Stand basal area increments averaged 1.76 m2 ha-1 y-1 and thinning did not significantly reduce stand basal area increment even in the first year after treatment. Over the 6 y of measurement, the relative basal area growth in thinned-only forest was 47–67% higher than in unthinned forest, and in thinned and coppice-treated forest basal area increases were 60–89% greater than in unthinned (a further 15–23% over thinned-only). Basal area increment for the potential sawlog trees (the largest 150 stems ha-1) in thinned-only forest exceeded basal area increment of potential sawlogs in unthinned forest by 40–60%. In forest where coppice competition was removed, growth rates were increased by a further 15–20% in all years. Smaller trees retained in thinned forest (potential pulpwood for a second thinning) grew 69% faster than similarly-sized trees in unthinned forest, and removal of coppice competition increased this response by a further 38%. Competition from coppice regeneration developing on cut stumps reduced potential basal area growth of retained trees by about 20% in all years following thinning. Coppice contributed extra basal area to the stand (from 0.7 m2 ha-1 y-1 in the first year after thinning to 1.3 m1 ha-1 y-1 in the sixth year). After 6 y, coppice regeneration from cut stumps persisted in thinned-only forest (but declined from 1100 to 500 coppice stems ha-1) and contributed about 16% of total basal area, but less than 1% in volume.

Key concepts: Coppicing, Thinning, Basal area, Pulpwood, Silviculture, Forestry, Forest management, Stocking

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effects of thinning and coppice control on stand productivity and structure in a silvertop ash (Eucalyptus sieberiL. Johnson) forest — Research Paper | ScholarLens