2008•Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck SurgeryRequires access

Framework Changes Using Costal Cartilage for Microtia Reconstruction

Victor Kizhner, Ami Barak

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Since a known growth-of-cartilage framework is used for reconstruction of microtia under the Brent technique, we set out to address the behavior of the framework under the Nagata technique. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of costal cartilage auricular reconstruction procedures. PATIENTS: A total of 28 patients who underwent costal cartilage auricular reconstruction between 1998 and 2005. INTERVENTIONS: Reconstruction of microtia using the 2-stage Nagata technique. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The parameters checked were patient age at the time of reconstruction, follow-up time, and measurements of the auricular framework height and width both at the time of implantation (represented by the template size) and at final follow-up. RESULTS: A significant change in auricular height and width was observed. The height decreased by 3.1%, while the width increased by 4.0%. This change was not influenced by follow-up time. CONCLUSIONS: Auricular reconstruction with the Nagata technique was undertaken when the patients were aged 9 to 10 years, when the auricle had reached nearly its final size. According to our patient sample, it is our opinion that a policy change is unjustifiable.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: Since a known growth-of-cartilage framework is used for reconstruction of microtia under the Brent technique, we set out to address the behavior of the framework under the Nagata technique. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of costal cartilage auricular reconstruction procedures. PATIENTS: A total of 28 patients who underwent costal cartilage auricular reconstruction between 1998 and 2005. INTERVENTIONS: Reconstruction of microtia using the 2-stage Nagata technique. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The parameters checked were patient age at the time of reconstruction, follow-up time, and measurements of the auricular framework height and width both at the time of implantation (represented by the template size) and at final follow-up. RESULTS: A significant change in auricular height and width was observed. The height decreased by 3.1%, while the width increased by 4.0%. This change was not influenced by follow-up time. CONCLUSIONS: Auricular reconstruction with the Nagata technique was undertaken when the patients were aged 9 to 10 years, when the auricle had reached nearly its final size. According to our patient sample, it is our opinion that a policy change is unjustifiable.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: Since a known growth-of-cartilage framework is used for reconstruction of microtia under the Brent technique, we set out to address the behavior of the framework under the Nagata technique. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of costal cartilage auricular reconstruction procedures. PATIENTS: A total of 28 patients who underwent costal cartilage auricular reconstruction between 1998 and 2005. INTERVENTIONS: Reconstruction of microtia using the 2-stage Nagata technique. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The parameters checked were patient age at the time of reconstruction, follow-up time, and measurements of the auricular framework height and width both at the time of implantation (represented by the template size) and at final follow-up. RESULTS: A significant change in auricular height and width was observed. The height decreased by 3.1%, while the width increased by 4.0%. This change was not influenced by follow-up time. CONCLUSIONS: Auricular reconstruction with the Nagata technique was undertaken when the patients were aged 9 to 10 years, when the auricle had reached nearly its final size. According to our patient sample, it is our opinion that a policy change is unjustifiable.

Key concepts: Microtia, Costal cartilage, Auricle, Medicine, Cartilage, Surgery, Orthodontics, Anatomy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Framework Changes Using Costal Cartilage for Microtia Reconstruction — Research Paper | ScholarLens