1998Journal of Agricultural and Food ChemistryRequires access

Pesticide Residues in Prune Processing

Paolo Cabras, Alberto Angioni, Vincenzo L. Garau, Filippo M. Pirisi, Vincenzo Brandolini, Franco Cabitza, Mario Cubeddu

Open publisher page 47 citations

Abstract

Prunes are processed in three phases: washing, drying, and rehydration, which is performed immediately before packing. The entire drying process was subdivided into six steps. In this paper each of these steps was studied separately in order to determine which could be accountable for residue changes. The studied pesticides were diazinon, bitertanol, iprodione, phosalone, and procymidone. Although the drying process caused a fruit concentration factor of 3, the pesticide residues on the dried fruits were not higher than on the fresh fruits. Phosalone showed the same residue, while the values for procymidone, iprodione, and bitertanol were respectively 0.6, 2.3, and 3.2 times lower. The changes in residue values caused by the different steps were not the same in the different pesticides. Keywords: Prunes; drying process; pesticides; residues

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Prunes are processed in three phases: washing, drying, and rehydration, which is performed immediately before packing. The entire drying process was subdivided into six steps. In this paper each of these steps was studied separately in order to determine which could be accountable for residue changes. The studied pesticides were diazinon, bitertanol, iprodione, phosalone, and procymidone. Although the drying process caused a fruit concentration factor of 3, the pesticide residues on the dried fruits were not higher than on the fresh fruits. Phosalone showed the same residue, while the values for procymidone, iprodione, and bitertanol were respectively 0.6, 2.3, and 3.2 times lower. The changes in residue values caused by the different steps were not the same in the different pesticides. Keywords: Prunes; drying process; pesticides; residues

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 47 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Prunes are processed in three phases: washing, drying, and rehydration, which is performed immediately before packing. The entire drying process was subdivided into six steps. In this paper each of these steps was studied separately in order to determine which could be accountable for residue changes. The studied pesticides were diazinon, bitertanol, iprodione, phosalone, and procymidone. Although the drying process caused a fruit concentration factor of 3, the pesticide residues on the dried fruits were not higher than on the fresh fruits. Phosalone showed the same residue, while the values for procymidone, iprodione, and bitertanol were respectively 0.6, 2.3, and 3.2 times lower. The changes in residue values caused by the different steps were not the same in the different pesticides. Keywords: Prunes; drying process; pesticides; residues

Key concepts: Phosalone, Procymidone, Iprodione, Pesticide residue, Chemistry, Residue (chemistry), Pesticide, Captan

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Pesticide Residues in Prune Processing — Research Paper | ScholarLens