1982The Astrophysical JournalRequires access

Systematic properties of compact groups of galaxies

Paul Hickson

Open publisher page 671 citations

Abstract

An analysis of estimated galaxy magnitudes, morphology, and group angular size for the case of 100 compact groups of galaxies indicates that (1) there is no correlation between group density and magnitude difference between first- and second-ranked galaxies, (2) there is no preferred morphological type for the first-ranked galaxies, many of which are spiral, (3) the groups contain fewer spirals than a comparable sample of field galaxies, and (4) there seems to be a deficiency of faint galaxies, in comparison with rich cluster and field galaxies. This apparent deficiency is greater in groups with elliptical, first-ranked galaxies. Implications of the above results are discussed from the viewpoint of dynamical evolution.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

An analysis of estimated galaxy magnitudes, morphology, and group angular size for the case of 100 compact groups of galaxies indicates that (1) there is no correlation between group density and magnitude difference between first- and second-ranked galaxies, (2) there is no preferred morphological type for the first-ranked galaxies, many of which are spiral, (3) the groups contain fewer spirals than a comparable sample of field galaxies, and (4) there seems to be a deficiency of faint galaxies, in comparison with rich cluster and field galaxies. This apparent deficiency is greater in groups with elliptical, first-ranked galaxies. Implications of the above results are discussed from the viewpoint of dynamical evolution.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 671 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

An analysis of estimated galaxy magnitudes, morphology, and group angular size for the case of 100 compact groups of galaxies indicates that (1) there is no correlation between group density and magnitude difference between first- and second-ranked galaxies, (2) there is no preferred morphological type for the first-ranked galaxies, many of which are spiral, (3) the groups contain fewer spirals than a comparable sample of field galaxies, and (4) there seems to be a deficiency of faint galaxies, in comparison with rich cluster and field galaxies. This apparent deficiency is greater in groups with elliptical, first-ranked galaxies. Implications of the above results are discussed from the viewpoint of dynamical evolution.

Key concepts: Physics, Astrophysics, Elliptical galaxy, Galaxy group, Disc, Luminous infrared galaxy, Galaxy cluster, Spiral galaxy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Systematic properties of compact groups of galaxies — Research Paper | ScholarLens