1994•CirculationOpen access

Mitral valve replacement versus mitral valve repair. A Doppler and quantitative stress echocardiographic study.

Marc D. Tischler, Kyle A. Cooper, Michaelanne Rowen, Martin M. LeWinter

Open full text 99 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Standard mitral valve replacement (MVR) in patients with chronic mitral regurgitation results in consistent reductions in resting postoperative ejection fraction. This has been attributed to removal of the low-impedance ejection pathway into the left atrium or to disruption of the chordal apparatus. Mitral valve repair (MVP) does not reduce ejection fraction at rest. However, whether MVP confers any advantages with regard to dynamic left ventricular performance has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to directly compare standard MVR with MVP and to determine their respective influences on ventricular ejection performance during bicycle exercise. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ten consecutive patients with pure chronic mitral regurgitation who underwent MVP and 10 patients matched for age, sex, and preoperative ejection fraction who underwent standard MVR for pure chronic mitral regurgitation performed symptom-limited, graded upright bicycle exercise with simultaneous Doppler and quantitative two-dimensional echocardiography. Patients with MVP had significantly greater rest (55 +/- 12%) and exercise (63 +/- 11%) ejection fractions than matched patients with MVR (40 +/- 13% [P < .0001] and 42 +/- 17% [P < .005], respectively). End-systolic circumferential wall stress was significantly lower at rest (190 +/- 36 versus 244 +/- 46; P < .03) and at peak exercise (231 +/- 46 versus 300 +/- 52; P < .02) in patients with MVP. At peak exercise, left ventricular shape was significantly more spherical in patients with MVR than those with MVP (1.84 +/- 0.31 versus 2.45 +/- 0.59; P < .02). CONCLUSIONS: MVR with chordal transection resulted in significant reductions in rest and exercise ejection fraction. This was caused in part by a significant increase in end-systolic circumferential wall stress. MVP resulted in improved rest and exercise ejection indexes, primarily due to a marked reduction in end-systolic stress and maintenance of a more ellipsoidal chamber geometry.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Standard mitral valve replacement (MVR) in patients with chronic mitral regurgitation results in consistent reductions in resting postoperative ejection fraction. This has been attributed to removal of the low-impedance ejection pathway into the left atrium or to disruption of the chordal apparatus. Mitral valve repair (MVP) does not reduce ejection fraction at rest. However, whether MVP confers any advantages with regard to dynamic left ventricular performance has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to directly compare standard MVR with MVP and to determine their respective influences on ventricular ejection performance during bicycle exercise. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ten consecutive patients with pure chronic mitral regurgitation who underwent MVP and 10 patients matched for age, sex, and preoperative ejection fraction who underwent standard MVR for pure chronic mitral regurgitation performed symptom-limited, graded upright bicycle exercise with simultaneous Doppler and quantitative two-dimensional echocardiography. Patients with MVP had significantly greater rest (55 +/- 12%) and exercise (63 +/- 11%) ejection fractions than matched patients with MVR (40 +/- 13% [P < .0001] and 42 +/- 17% [P < .005], respectively). End-systolic circumferential wall stress was significantly lower at rest (190 +/- 36 versus 244 +/- 46; P < .03) and at peak exercise (231 +/- 46 versus 300 +/- 52; P < .02) in patients with MVP. At peak exercise, left ventricular shape was significantly more spherical in patients with MVR than those with MVP (1.84 +/- 0.31 versus 2.45 +/- 0.59; P < .02). CONCLUSIONS: MVR with chordal transection resulted in significant reductions in rest and exercise ejection fraction. This was caused in part by a significant increase in end-systolic circumferential wall stress. MVP resulted in improved rest and exercise ejection indexes, primarily due to a marked reduction in end-systolic stress and maintenance of a more ellipsoidal chamber geometry.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 99 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Standard mitral valve replacement (MVR) in patients with chronic mitral regurgitation results in consistent reductions in resting postoperative ejection fraction. This has been attributed to removal of the low-impedance ejection pathway into the left atrium or to disruption of the chordal apparatus. Mitral valve repair (MVP) does not reduce ejection fraction at rest. However, whether MVP confers any advantages with regard to dynamic left ventricular performance has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to directly compare standard MVR with MVP and to determine their respective influences on ventricular ejection performance during bicycle exercise. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ten consecutive patients with pure chronic mitral regurgitation who underwent MVP and 10 patients matched for age, sex, and preoperative ejection fraction who underwent standard MVR for pure chronic mitral regurgitation performed symptom-limited, graded upright bicycle exercise with simultaneous Doppler and quantitative two-dimensional echocardiography. Patients with MVP had significantly greater rest (55 +/- 12%) and exercise (63 +/- 11%) ejection fractions than matched patients with MVR (40 +/- 13% [P < .0001] and 42 +/- 17% [P < .005], respectively). End-systolic circumferential wall stress was significantly lower at rest (190 +/- 36 versus 244 +/- 46; P < .03) and at peak exercise (231 +/- 46 versus 300 +/- 52; P < .02) in patients with MVP. At peak exercise, left ventricular shape was significantly more spherical in patients with MVR than those with MVP (1.84 +/- 0.31 versus 2.45 +/- 0.59; P < .02). CONCLUSIONS: MVR with chordal transection resulted in significant reductions in rest and exercise ejection fraction. This was caused in part by a significant increase in end-systolic circumferential wall stress. MVP resulted in improved rest and exercise ejection indexes, primarily due to a marked reduction in end-systolic stress and maintenance of a more ellipsoidal chamber geometry.

Key concepts: Medicine, Ejection fraction, Cardiology, Internal medicine, Mitral regurgitation, Mitral valve, Mitral valve replacement, Mitral valve repair

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Mitral valve replacement versus mitral valve repair. A Doppler and quantitative stress echocardiographic study. — Research Paper | ScholarLens