1999European Journal of AnaesthesiologyRequires access

Patient-controlled sedation using propofol: randomized, double-blind dose refinement

A.F. Smith, S. J. Thorpe, Lucy Cook

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

This double-blind, randomized trial compared the onset of sedation with two patient-controlled sedation regimens, allowing a maximum of 16 or 25 mg min-1 propofol. Forty fit young patients presenting for elective surgery were asked to try to put themselves to sleep using the system. Onset times of sedative effect, slurred speech and amnesia were recorded. All patients achieved satisfactory sedation, and none became oversedated. Patients receiving 16 mg min-1 propofol were not reliably sedated within 5 min and took significantly longer to develop slurred speech and amnesia (P < 0.01 for both). We conclude that this maximum infusion rate does not produce amnesia or sedation rapidly enough to be clinically useful. A maximum infusion rate of 25 mg min-1 allowed rapid sedation in all patients without oversedation and may be an acceptable compromise between efficacy and safety.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This double-blind, randomized trial compared the onset of sedation with two patient-controlled sedation regimens, allowing a maximum of 16 or 25 mg min-1 propofol. Forty fit young patients presenting for elective surgery were asked to try to put themselves to sleep using the system. Onset times of sedative effect, slurred speech and amnesia were recorded. All patients achieved satisfactory sedation, and none became oversedated. Patients receiving 16 mg min-1 propofol were not reliably sedated within 5 min and took significantly longer to develop slurred speech and amnesia (P < 0.01 for both). We conclude that this maximum infusion rate does not produce amnesia or sedation rapidly enough to be clinically useful. A maximum infusion rate of 25 mg min-1 allowed rapid sedation in all patients without oversedation and may be an acceptable compromise between efficacy and safety.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This double-blind, randomized trial compared the onset of sedation with two patient-controlled sedation regimens, allowing a maximum of 16 or 25 mg min-1 propofol. Forty fit young patients presenting for elective surgery were asked to try to put themselves to sleep using the system. Onset times of sedative effect, slurred speech and amnesia were recorded. All patients achieved satisfactory sedation, and none became oversedated. Patients receiving 16 mg min-1 propofol were not reliably sedated within 5 min and took significantly longer to develop slurred speech and amnesia (P < 0.01 for both). We conclude that this maximum infusion rate does not produce amnesia or sedation rapidly enough to be clinically useful. A maximum infusion rate of 25 mg min-1 allowed rapid sedation in all patients without oversedation and may be an acceptable compromise between efficacy and safety.

Key concepts: Medicine, Propofol, Sedation, Randomized controlled trial, Double blind, Anesthesia, Surgery, Alternative medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Patient-controlled sedation using propofol: randomized, double-blind dose refinement — Research Paper | ScholarLens