2011Drug Metabolism and PharmacokineticsRequires access

The Exposure of Luteolin Is Much Lower than That of Apigenin in Oral Administration of Flos Chrysanthemi Extract to Rats

Zhongjian Chen, Mei‐Juan Tu, Siyuan Sun, Sisi Kong, Yuqing Wang, YE Jiang-feng, Liping Li, Su Zeng, Huidi Jiang

Open publisher page 52 citations

Abstract

Luteolin (3',4',5,7-tetrahydroxyflavone) and apigenin (4',5,7-trihydroxyflavone) are two common flavones and major bioactive components in Flos Chrysanthemi extract (FCE). Although FCE contains approximately equal amounts of luteolin (6.5%, w/w) and apigenin (5.4%, w/w), luteolin showed a much lower exposure than apigenin when FCE was orally administered to rats. The aim of the present study is to elucidate the mechanisms that caused the pharmacokinetic difference between luteolin and apigenin in rats. The results of an in situ rat intestinal single-pass perfusion model showed that the permeability of luteolin (k(a), 7.96×10⁻² min⁻¹ and P(eff), 4.87×10⁻³ cm/min) was about 50% that of apigenin (k(a), 18.5×10⁻² min⁻¹ and P(eff), 10.8×10⁻³ cm/min), which agreed with the observation that oral bioavailability of luteolin (30.4%) from FCE was significantly lower than that of apigenin (51.1%). On the other hand, luteolin was much more unstable than apigenin during the incubation with primary rat hepatocytes, and methylated metabolites of luteolin were detected after incubation. In addition, further metabolism of methylated luteolin also contributed to the faster elimination of luteolin. In conclusion, luteolin and apigenin are very similar in structure, however, one-hydroxyl difference gives them different characteristics in absorption and metabolism, which results in much lower exposure of luteolin than apigenin when FCE is orally administered to rats.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Luteolin (3',4',5,7-tetrahydroxyflavone) and apigenin (4',5,7-trihydroxyflavone) are two common flavones and major bioactive components in Flos Chrysanthemi extract (FCE). Although FCE contains approximately equal amounts of luteolin (6.5%, w/w) and apigenin (5.4%, w/w), luteolin showed a much lower exposure than apigenin when FCE was orally administered to rats. The aim of the present study is to elucidate the mechanisms that caused the pharmacokinetic difference between luteolin and apigenin in rats. The results of an in situ rat intestinal single-pass perfusion model showed that the permeability of luteolin (k(a), 7.96×10⁻² min⁻¹ and P(eff), 4.87×10⁻³ cm/min) was about 50% that of apigenin (k(a), 18.5×10⁻² min⁻¹ and P(eff), 10.8×10⁻³ cm/min), which agreed with the observation that oral bioavailability of luteolin (30.4%) from FCE was significantly lower than that of apigenin (51.1%). On the other hand, luteolin was much more unstable than apigenin during the incubation with primary rat hepatocytes, and methylated metabolites of luteolin were detected after incubation. In addition, further metabolism of methylated luteolin also contributed to the faster elimination of luteolin. In conclusion, luteolin and apigenin are very similar in structure, however, one-hydroxyl difference gives them different characteristics in absorption and metabolism, which results in much lower exposure of luteolin than apigenin when FCE is orally administered to rats.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 52 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Luteolin (3',4',5,7-tetrahydroxyflavone) and apigenin (4',5,7-trihydroxyflavone) are two common flavones and major bioactive components in Flos Chrysanthemi extract (FCE). Although FCE contains approximately equal amounts of luteolin (6.5%, w/w) and apigenin (5.4%, w/w), luteolin showed a much lower exposure than apigenin when FCE was orally administered to rats. The aim of the present study is to elucidate the mechanisms that caused the pharmacokinetic difference between luteolin and apigenin in rats. The results of an in situ rat intestinal single-pass perfusion model showed that the permeability of luteolin (k(a), 7.96×10⁻² min⁻¹ and P(eff), 4.87×10⁻³ cm/min) was about 50% that of apigenin (k(a), 18.5×10⁻² min⁻¹ and P(eff), 10.8×10⁻³ cm/min), which agreed with the observation that oral bioavailability of luteolin (30.4%) from FCE was significantly lower than that of apigenin (51.1%). On the other hand, luteolin was much more unstable than apigenin during the incubation with primary rat hepatocytes, and methylated metabolites of luteolin were detected after incubation. In addition, further metabolism of methylated luteolin also contributed to the faster elimination of luteolin. In conclusion, luteolin and apigenin are very similar in structure, however, one-hydroxyl difference gives them different characteristics in absorption and metabolism, which results in much lower exposure of luteolin than apigenin when FCE is orally administered to rats.

Key concepts: Luteolin, Apigenin, Flavones, Chemistry, Bioavailability, Pharmacology, Oral administration, Biochemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Exposure of Luteolin Is Much Lower than That of Apigenin in Oral Administration of Flos Chrysanthemi Extract to Rats — Research Paper | ScholarLens