2013Middle East Fertility Society JournalOpen access

Is the Time of administration of misoprostol of value? The uterotonic effect of misoprostol given pre- and post-operative after elective cesarean section

Ahmed H. Abdellah, Abdel Aziz E. Tamam, Mostafa M. Khodry

Open full text 9 citations

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to compare blood loss in pre- and post-operatively rectally administered 600 μg of misoprostol in elective cesarean delivery, in order to determine the optimal time for drug administration (CS). A 30-month prospective, single-blind, randomized, clinical trial was done in the Qena University Hospital, Egypt, from January 2010 to October, 2012. Intervention consisted of pre and post-operative rectally administered misoprostol. At baseline, there were no significant differences in the demographic and obstetric variable between groups. Primary outcome measures were differences in intra-operative and postoperative blood loss between groups. Secondary outcomes measures were hemoglobin levels pre and operative (24 h after CS) and the need for additional uterotonic drugs. A total of 300 subjects were enrolled (pre-operative administrated rectally misoprostol n = 150, post-operative administrated rectally misoprostol n = 150). Subjects receiving pre-operative misoprostol achieved significantly lower blood loss compared to those receiving post-operative misoprostol (620 ± 291 ml vs. 898 ± 321 ml, p < 0.05), respectively. The need for additional uterotonic was significantly higher in subjects receiving post-operative misoprostol compared to those receiving pre-operative misoprostol (53.3% vs. 30%, p, 0.05), respectively. Pre-operative rectally administrated misoprostol appears to be more effective than post-operative rectally administrated misoprostol in reducing blood loss, and in decreasing the need for other uterotonic drugs in cesarean section delivery.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The aim of the current study was to compare blood loss in pre- and post-operatively rectally administered 600 μg of misoprostol in elective cesarean delivery, in order to determine the optimal time for drug administration (CS). A 30-month prospective, single-blind, randomized, clinical trial was done in the Qena University Hospital, Egypt, from January 2010 to October, 2012. Intervention consisted of pre and post-operative rectally administered misoprostol. At baseline, there were no significant differences in the demographic and obstetric variable between groups. Primary outcome measures were differences in intra-operative and postoperative blood loss between groups. Secondary outcomes measures were hemoglobin levels pre and operative (24 h after CS) and the need for additional uterotonic drugs. A total of 300 subjects were enrolled (pre-operative administrated rectally misoprostol n = 150, post-operative administrated rectally misoprostol n = 150). Subjects receiving pre-operative misoprostol achieved significantly lower blood loss compared to those receiving post-operative misoprostol (620 ± 291 ml vs. 898 ± 321 ml, p < 0.05), respectively. The need for additional uterotonic was significantly higher in subjects receiving post-operative misoprostol compared to those receiving pre-operative misoprostol (53.3% vs. 30%, p, 0.05), respectively. Pre-operative rectally administrated misoprostol appears to be more effective than post-operative rectally administrated misoprostol in reducing blood loss, and in decreasing the need for other uterotonic drugs in cesarean section delivery.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The aim of the current study was to compare blood loss in pre- and post-operatively rectally administered 600 μg of misoprostol in elective cesarean delivery, in order to determine the optimal time for drug administration (CS). A 30-month prospective, single-blind, randomized, clinical trial was done in the Qena University Hospital, Egypt, from January 2010 to October, 2012. Intervention consisted of pre and post-operative rectally administered misoprostol. At baseline, there were no significant differences in the demographic and obstetric variable between groups. Primary outcome measures were differences in intra-operative and postoperative blood loss between groups. Secondary outcomes measures were hemoglobin levels pre and operative (24 h after CS) and the need for additional uterotonic drugs. A total of 300 subjects were enrolled (pre-operative administrated rectally misoprostol n = 150, post-operative administrated rectally misoprostol n = 150). Subjects receiving pre-operative misoprostol achieved significantly lower blood loss compared to those receiving post-operative misoprostol (620 ± 291 ml vs. 898 ± 321 ml, p < 0.05), respectively. The need for additional uterotonic was significantly higher in subjects receiving post-operative misoprostol compared to those receiving pre-operative misoprostol (53.3% vs. 30%, p, 0.05), respectively. Pre-operative rectally administrated misoprostol appears to be more effective than post-operative rectally administrated misoprostol in reducing blood loss, and in decreasing the need for other uterotonic drugs in cesarean section delivery.

Key concepts: Misoprostol, Uterotonic, Medicine, Blood loss, Anesthesia, Obstetrics, Randomized controlled trial, Pregnancy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Is the Time of administration of misoprostol of value? The uterotonic effect of misoprostol given pre- and post-operative after elective cesarean section — Research Paper | ScholarLens