1999Starch - StärkeRequires access

Characterization ofAmaranthus cruentus andChenopodium quinoa Starch

JianYa Qian, Manfred Kühn

Open publisher page 83 citations

Abstract

Starches from amaranth (Amaranthus cruentus) and quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) were isolated and investigated by using enzymatic assay, Rapid Visco Analysis (RVA), Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and X-ray Diffractometry (XRD). Amylose content measured enzymatically was 7.8 and 11.2 % for amaranth and quinoa starch, respectively. Quinoa starch was much more viscous than amaranth starch and gelatinized at a lower temperature as determined with RVA. DSC demonstrated a wider gelatinization temperature range for amaranth starch (20.6°C) than for quinoa starch (11.1°C). SEM observation revealed polygonal shape of starch granules, and XRD suggested a typical Atype diffraction pattern for both the starches in question. A crystallinity of 45.5 % for amaranth and 35.4 % for quinoa starch, respectively, was also determined from the XRD collected data.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Starches from amaranth (Amaranthus cruentus) and quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) were isolated and investigated by using enzymatic assay, Rapid Visco Analysis (RVA), Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and X-ray Diffractometry (XRD). Amylose content measured enzymatically was 7.8 and 11.2 % for amaranth and quinoa starch, respectively. Quinoa starch was much more viscous than amaranth starch and gelatinized at a lower temperature as determined with RVA. DSC demonstrated a wider gelatinization temperature range for amaranth starch (20.6°C) than for quinoa starch (11.1°C). SEM observation revealed polygonal shape of starch granules, and XRD suggested a typical Atype diffraction pattern for both the starches in question. A crystallinity of 45.5 % for amaranth and 35.4 % for quinoa starch, respectively, was also determined from the XRD collected data.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 83 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Starches from amaranth (Amaranthus cruentus) and quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) were isolated and investigated by using enzymatic assay, Rapid Visco Analysis (RVA), Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and X-ray Diffractometry (XRD). Amylose content measured enzymatically was 7.8 and 11.2 % for amaranth and quinoa starch, respectively. Quinoa starch was much more viscous than amaranth starch and gelatinized at a lower temperature as determined with RVA. DSC demonstrated a wider gelatinization temperature range for amaranth starch (20.6°C) than for quinoa starch (11.1°C). SEM observation revealed polygonal shape of starch granules, and XRD suggested a typical Atype diffraction pattern for both the starches in question. A crystallinity of 45.5 % for amaranth and 35.4 % for quinoa starch, respectively, was also determined from the XRD collected data.

Key concepts: Amaranth, Chenopodium quinoa, Starch, Amaranthus cruentus, Differential scanning calorimetry, Crystallinity, Amylose, Amaranthaceae

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Characterization ofAmaranthus cruentus andChenopodium quinoa Starch — Research Paper | ScholarLens