1982•CirculationRequires access

Electrophysiologic effects of disopyramide in patients with atrioventricular nodal dysfunction.

Peter R. Wilkinson, Jessica Desai, J Hollister, Rolando P. Gonzalez, Joseph A. Abbott, Melvin M. Scheinman

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

Seventeen patients with first-degree or Mobitz I atrioventricular (AV) block and narrow QRS complexes underwent electrophysiologic drug testing before and after i.v. administration of disopyramide. Disopyramide did not significantly change the mean sinus cycle length (895 +/- 131 vs 877 +/- 119 msec), mean maximal sinus node recovery time (1134 +/- 160 vs 1133 +/- 13 msec), mean atrial effective refractory period (314 +/- 72 vs 307 +/- 54 msec), mean AV nodal conduction time (187 +/- 79 vs 180 +/- 73 msec) or the mean paced cycle length at which AV nodal Wenckebach conduction occurred (545 +/- 144 vs 497 +/- 130 msec) after disopyramide. The mean AV nodal effective refractory period decreased significantly (from 535 +/- 137 to 521 +/- 122 msec), and both infranodal conduction time and the paced ventricular cycle length producing ventriculoatrial block increased significantly (from 56 +/- 12 to 63 +/- 13 msec and from 625 +/- 158 to 655 +/- 157 msec, respectively). We conclude that i.v. disopyramide administered in a dose resulting in therapeutic blood levels showed no adverse effects on AV nodal conduction in patients with AV nodal dysfunction. In contrast, i.v. disopyramide depressed retrograde AV conduction.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Seventeen patients with first-degree or Mobitz I atrioventricular (AV) block and narrow QRS complexes underwent electrophysiologic drug testing before and after i.v. administration of disopyramide. Disopyramide did not significantly change the mean sinus cycle length (895 +/- 131 vs 877 +/- 119 msec), mean maximal sinus node recovery time (1134 +/- 160 vs 1133 +/- 13 msec), mean atrial effective refractory period (314 +/- 72 vs 307 +/- 54 msec), mean AV nodal conduction time (187 +/- 79 vs 180 +/- 73 msec) or the mean paced cycle length at which AV nodal Wenckebach conduction occurred (545 +/- 144 vs 497 +/- 130 msec) after disopyramide. The mean AV nodal effective refractory period decreased significantly (from 535 +/- 137 to 521 +/- 122 msec), and both infranodal conduction time and the paced ventricular cycle length producing ventriculoatrial block increased significantly (from 56 +/- 12 to 63 +/- 13 msec and from 625 +/- 158 to 655 +/- 157 msec, respectively). We conclude that i.v. disopyramide administered in a dose resulting in therapeutic blood levels showed no adverse effects on AV nodal conduction in patients with AV nodal dysfunction. In contrast, i.v. disopyramide depressed retrograde AV conduction.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Seventeen patients with first-degree or Mobitz I atrioventricular (AV) block and narrow QRS complexes underwent electrophysiologic drug testing before and after i.v. administration of disopyramide. Disopyramide did not significantly change the mean sinus cycle length (895 +/- 131 vs 877 +/- 119 msec), mean maximal sinus node recovery time (1134 +/- 160 vs 1133 +/- 13 msec), mean atrial effective refractory period (314 +/- 72 vs 307 +/- 54 msec), mean AV nodal conduction time (187 +/- 79 vs 180 +/- 73 msec) or the mean paced cycle length at which AV nodal Wenckebach conduction occurred (545 +/- 144 vs 497 +/- 130 msec) after disopyramide. The mean AV nodal effective refractory period decreased significantly (from 535 +/- 137 to 521 +/- 122 msec), and both infranodal conduction time and the paced ventricular cycle length producing ventriculoatrial block increased significantly (from 56 +/- 12 to 63 +/- 13 msec and from 625 +/- 158 to 655 +/- 157 msec, respectively). We conclude that i.v. disopyramide administered in a dose resulting in therapeutic blood levels showed no adverse effects on AV nodal conduction in patients with AV nodal dysfunction. In contrast, i.v. disopyramide depressed retrograde AV conduction.

Key concepts: Disopyramide, Medicine, Effective refractory period, NODAL, Cardiology, QRS complex, Internal medicine, Atrioventricular node

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Electrophysiologic effects of disopyramide in patients with atrioventricular nodal dysfunction. — Research Paper | ScholarLens