Pooling multivariate data
S. Ejaz Ahmed, A. K. Md. Ehsanes Saleh
Abstract
S. Ejaz Ahmed, A. K. Md. Ehsanes Saleh
Abstract
In case it is doubtful whether two sets of data have the same mean vector, four estimation strategies have been developed for the target mean vector. In this situation, the estimates based on a preliminary test as well as on Stein-rule are advantageous. Two measures of relative efficiency are considered; one based on thequadratic loss function, and the other on the determinant of the mean square error matrix. A max-min rule for the size of the preliminary test of significance is presented. It is demonstrated that the shrinkage estimator dominates the classical estimator, whereas none of the shrinkage estimator and the preliminary test estimator dominate each other. The range in the parameter space where preliminary test estimator dominates shrinkage is investigated analytically and computationally. It is found that the shrinkage estimator outperform the preliminary test estimator except in a region around the null hypothesis. Moreover, for large values of a, the level of statistical significance, shrinkage estimator dominates the preliminary test estimator uniformly. The relative dominance of the estimators is presented.
OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In case it is doubtful whether two sets of data have the same mean vector, four estimation strategies have been developed for the target mean vector. In this situation, the estimates based on a preliminary test as well as on Stein-rule are advantageous. Two measures of relative efficiency are considered; one based on thequadratic loss function, and the other on the determinant of the mean square error matrix. A max-min rule for the size of the preliminary test of significance is presented. It is demonstrated that the shrinkage estimator dominates the classical estimator, whereas none of the shrinkage estimator and the preliminary test estimator dominate each other. The range in the parameter space where preliminary test estimator dominates shrinkage is investigated analytically and computationally. It is found that the shrinkage estimator outperform the preliminary test estimator except in a region around the null hypothesis. Moreover, for large values of a, the level of statistical significance, shrinkage estimator dominates the preliminary test estimator uniformly. The relative dominance of the estimators is presented.
Key concepts: Shrinkage estimator, Mathematics, Estimator, James–Stein estimator, Statistics, Bias of an estimator, Stein's unbiased risk estimate, Efficient estimator