2000Australian Accounting ReviewRequires access

‘Fair Value’ for Financial Instruments: How Erasing Theory is Leading to Unworkable Global Accounting Standards for Performance Reporting

Joanne Horton, Richard Macve

Open publisher page 56 citations

Abstract

The LASC is pursuing proposals for accounting for financial instruments that are conceptually flawed and unworkable in practice. “Fair value” has been elevated to a catch‐all concept to resolve measurement issues objectively. Adoption of fair value, as cuwently interpreted by standard‐setters (eg, by the FASB in Concepts Statement No. 7, issued in February 2000), threatens to drive out a long‐understood, theory‐based approach to the rationales for cuwent value accounting — founded on “deprival value” — that has recently been comprehensively restated in Accounting Theory Monograph 10, issued by the Australian Accounting Research Foundation in 1998, and reaffirmed in the UK Accounting Standards Board's Statement of Principles for Financial Repovting, issued in December 1999.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The LASC is pursuing proposals for accounting for financial instruments that are conceptually flawed and unworkable in practice. “Fair value” has been elevated to a catch‐all concept to resolve measurement issues objectively. Adoption of fair value, as cuwently interpreted by standard‐setters (eg, by the FASB in Concepts Statement No. 7, issued in February 2000), threatens to drive out a long‐understood, theory‐based approach to the rationales for cuwent value accounting — founded on “deprival value” — that has recently been comprehensively restated in Accounting Theory Monograph 10, issued by the Australian Accounting Research Foundation in 1998, and reaffirmed in the UK Accounting Standards Board's Statement of Principles for Financial Repovting, issued in December 1999.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 56 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The LASC is pursuing proposals for accounting for financial instruments that are conceptually flawed and unworkable in practice. “Fair value” has been elevated to a catch‐all concept to resolve measurement issues objectively. Adoption of fair value, as cuwently interpreted by standard‐setters (eg, by the FASB in Concepts Statement No. 7, issued in February 2000), threatens to drive out a long‐understood, theory‐based approach to the rationales for cuwent value accounting — founded on “deprival value” — that has recently been comprehensively restated in Accounting Theory Monograph 10, issued by the Australian Accounting Research Foundation in 1998, and reaffirmed in the UK Accounting Standards Board's Statement of Principles for Financial Repovting, issued in December 1999.

Key concepts: Accounting, Fair value, Financial accounting, Mark-to-market accounting, Accounting standard, Financial statement, Value (mathematics), Foundation (evidence)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
‘Fair Value’ for Financial Instruments: How Erasing Theory is Leading to Unworkable Global Accounting Standards for Performance Reporting — Research Paper | ScholarLens