2006Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University)Requires access

Close corporations - should private companies be abolished in South Africa?

Michael Spisto

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In 1984 South Africa became the first country with a British company law system to effectively provide for the legal needs of the small businessman. The Close Corporations Act is one of the most remarkable and significant innovations in South African company law. Thus, since the close corporation has been introduced, a fundamental question arose as to whether this should result in the phasing out of the private company in South Africa. It can be argued that the boundaries between public and private companies in South Africa have become increasingly indistinct partly due to the creation of close corporations and partly because the present Companies Act, due to its voluminous nature and complexity, is difficult to apply and is out of touch with the needs of the country. Thus, the necessity for the continued rigid adherence to traditional statutory distinctions between private and public companies in South Africa should be seriously questioned. It would be advisable for South Africa to study the New Zealand corporate system. Although South Africa has the close corporation, which New Zealand does not have, the distinction between private and public companies in New Zealand was abolished. More than a decade has now passed and the abolition of these company types remains in New Zealand. In May 2004 the DTI issued for public comment a policy document to establish the approach that government intends taking to review company law in South Africa.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In 1984 South Africa became the first country with a British company law system to effectively provide for the legal needs of the small businessman. The Close Corporations Act is one of the most remarkable and significant innovations in South African company law. Thus, since the close corporation has been introduced, a fundamental question arose as to whether this should result in the phasing out of the private company in South Africa. It can be argued that the boundaries between public and private companies in South Africa have become increasingly indistinct partly due to the creation of close corporations and partly because the present Companies Act, due to its voluminous nature and complexity, is difficult to apply and is out of touch with the needs of the country. Thus, the necessity for the continued rigid adherence to traditional statutory distinctions between private and public companies in South Africa should be seriously questioned. It would be advisable for South Africa to study the New Zealand corporate system. Although South Africa has the close corporation, which New Zealand does not have, the distinction between private and public companies in New Zealand was abolished. More than a decade has now passed and the abolition of these company types remains in New Zealand. In May 2004 the DTI issued for public comment a policy document to establish the approach that government intends taking to review company law in South Africa.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In 1984 South Africa became the first country with a British company law system to effectively provide for the legal needs of the small businessman. The Close Corporations Act is one of the most remarkable and significant innovations in South African company law. Thus, since the close corporation has been introduced, a fundamental question arose as to whether this should result in the phasing out of the private company in South Africa. It can be argued that the boundaries between public and private companies in South Africa have become increasingly indistinct partly due to the creation of close corporations and partly because the present Companies Act, due to its voluminous nature and complexity, is difficult to apply and is out of touch with the needs of the country. Thus, the necessity for the continued rigid adherence to traditional statutory distinctions between private and public companies in South Africa should be seriously questioned. It would be advisable for South Africa to study the New Zealand corporate system. Although South Africa has the close corporation, which New Zealand does not have, the distinction between private and public companies in New Zealand was abolished. More than a decade has now passed and the abolition of these company types remains in New Zealand. In May 2004 the DTI issued for public comment a policy document to establish the approach that government intends taking to review company law in South Africa.

Key concepts: Statutory law, Corporation, Government (linguistics), Corporate law, Companies Act, Subsidiary, Law, Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Close corporations - should private companies be abolished in South Africa? — Research Paper | ScholarLens