1997FEMS Immunology & Medical MicrobiologyOpen access

Evaluation of different subcellular fractions ofVibrio choleraeO139 in protection to challenge in experimental cholera

Vijay P. Bondre, Vibha Sinha, Brahm S. Srivastava

Open full text 5 citations

Abstract

Various cellular fractions of Vibrio cholerae O139 were prepared and evaluated in the rabbit ileal loop model of experimental cholera for identification of the protective antigen(s) relevant for vaccine development. Lipopolysaccharides (LPS) and capsular polysaccharides (CPS) of O139 strains and its cell surface, membrane and cytosolic fractions were assayed for antibacterial immunity, whereas the cholera toxin was examined for antitoxic immunity. The lipopolysaccharides, membrane fraction and cholera toxin induced moderate protection, however there was a significant synergistic effect when cholera toxin was combined with membrane proteins or lipopolysaccharides. The O139 strains strongly resembled O1 strains in the profile of proteins and immunological cross reactivity, yet there was no cross protection. The results warrant further investigation of the pathogenesis of O139 strains and identify the critical somatic antigens relevant to protection.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Various cellular fractions of Vibrio cholerae O139 were prepared and evaluated in the rabbit ileal loop model of experimental cholera for identification of the protective antigen(s) relevant for vaccine development. Lipopolysaccharides (LPS) and capsular polysaccharides (CPS) of O139 strains and its cell surface, membrane and cytosolic fractions were assayed for antibacterial immunity, whereas the cholera toxin was examined for antitoxic immunity. The lipopolysaccharides, membrane fraction and cholera toxin induced moderate protection, however there was a significant synergistic effect when cholera toxin was combined with membrane proteins or lipopolysaccharides. The O139 strains strongly resembled O1 strains in the profile of proteins and immunological cross reactivity, yet there was no cross protection. The results warrant further investigation of the pathogenesis of O139 strains and identify the critical somatic antigens relevant to protection.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Various cellular fractions of Vibrio cholerae O139 were prepared and evaluated in the rabbit ileal loop model of experimental cholera for identification of the protective antigen(s) relevant for vaccine development. Lipopolysaccharides (LPS) and capsular polysaccharides (CPS) of O139 strains and its cell surface, membrane and cytosolic fractions were assayed for antibacterial immunity, whereas the cholera toxin was examined for antitoxic immunity. The lipopolysaccharides, membrane fraction and cholera toxin induced moderate protection, however there was a significant synergistic effect when cholera toxin was combined with membrane proteins or lipopolysaccharides. The O139 strains strongly resembled O1 strains in the profile of proteins and immunological cross reactivity, yet there was no cross protection. The results warrant further investigation of the pathogenesis of O139 strains and identify the critical somatic antigens relevant to protection.

Key concepts: Vibrio cholerae, Cholera toxin, Cholera vaccine, Microbiology, Cholera, Biology, Vibrionaceae, Toxin

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of different subcellular fractions ofVibrio choleraeO139 in protection to challenge in experimental cholera — Research Paper | ScholarLens