2009Journal of GlaucomaRequires access

Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measurement by Scanning Laser Polarimetry (GDxVCC) at Conventional and Modified Diameter Scans in Normals, Glaucoma Suspects, and Early Glaucoma Patients

Tanuj Dada, Ritu Gadia, Anand Aggarwal, Vivek Pravin Dave, Viney Gupta, Ramanjit Sihota

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) at 3 different scan diameters using GDxVCC in healthy, primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) suspects, and early POAG. METHOD: RNFL parameters were evaluated in 100 normal subjects, 50 POAG suspects, and 50 early POAG patients using GDxVCC at conventional small, medium, and large circle. TSNIT (temporal, superior, nasal, inferior, temporal) average, superior average, inferior average RNFL thickness, and nerve fiber indicator (NFI) were evaluated. RESULTS: The TSNIT average (microm) in normal subjects, POAG suspects, and POAG at 3 different circles was 54.17+/-4.6, 49.96+/-6.5, 46.92+/-6.2 (small); 47.17+/-4.8, 43.79+/-5.7, 41.48+/-6.5 (medium); and 41.57+/-4.6, 39.77+/-5.9, 38.33+/-7.1 (large). All RNFL parameters at all circles showed significant difference between normal and early POAG eyes (P<0.001). Area under the curve was 0.911 for NFI at all circles. All parameters at small and medium circle, all except TSNIT average at large circle showed significant difference between normal and POAG suspects (P<0.001), area under curve being the highest (0.780 to 0.801 at 3 circles) for NFI. All parameters progressively decreased with increasing diameter with significant difference between small-medium (P<0.001), medium-large (P<0.001), and small-large circle results (P<0.001) in all the groups for all parameters except NFI. CONCLUSIONS: Medium and large circles can also be used for RNFL evaluation in glaucoma. NFI is the best discriminating measure across all scan diameters.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

PURPOSE: To study the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) at 3 different scan diameters using GDxVCC in healthy, primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) suspects, and early POAG. METHOD: RNFL parameters were evaluated in 100 normal subjects, 50 POAG suspects, and 50 early POAG patients using GDxVCC at conventional small, medium, and large circle. TSNIT (temporal, superior, nasal, inferior, temporal) average, superior average, inferior average RNFL thickness, and nerve fiber indicator (NFI) were evaluated. RESULTS: The TSNIT average (microm) in normal subjects, POAG suspects, and POAG at 3 different circles was 54.17+/-4.6, 49.96+/-6.5, 46.92+/-6.2 (small); 47.17+/-4.8, 43.79+/-5.7, 41.48+/-6.5 (medium); and 41.57+/-4.6, 39.77+/-5.9, 38.33+/-7.1 (large). All RNFL parameters at all circles showed significant difference between normal and early POAG eyes (P<0.001). Area under the curve was 0.911 for NFI at all circles. All parameters at small and medium circle, all except TSNIT average at large circle showed significant difference between normal and POAG suspects (P<0.001), area under curve being the highest (0.780 to 0.801 at 3 circles) for NFI. All parameters progressively decreased with increasing diameter with significant difference between small-medium (P<0.001), medium-large (P<0.001), and small-large circle results (P<0.001) in all the groups for all parameters except NFI. CONCLUSIONS: Medium and large circles can also be used for RNFL evaluation in glaucoma. NFI is the best discriminating measure across all scan diameters.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

PURPOSE: To study the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) at 3 different scan diameters using GDxVCC in healthy, primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) suspects, and early POAG. METHOD: RNFL parameters were evaluated in 100 normal subjects, 50 POAG suspects, and 50 early POAG patients using GDxVCC at conventional small, medium, and large circle. TSNIT (temporal, superior, nasal, inferior, temporal) average, superior average, inferior average RNFL thickness, and nerve fiber indicator (NFI) were evaluated. RESULTS: The TSNIT average (microm) in normal subjects, POAG suspects, and POAG at 3 different circles was 54.17+/-4.6, 49.96+/-6.5, 46.92+/-6.2 (small); 47.17+/-4.8, 43.79+/-5.7, 41.48+/-6.5 (medium); and 41.57+/-4.6, 39.77+/-5.9, 38.33+/-7.1 (large). All RNFL parameters at all circles showed significant difference between normal and early POAG eyes (P<0.001). Area under the curve was 0.911 for NFI at all circles. All parameters at small and medium circle, all except TSNIT average at large circle showed significant difference between normal and POAG suspects (P<0.001), area under curve being the highest (0.780 to 0.801 at 3 circles) for NFI. All parameters progressively decreased with increasing diameter with significant difference between small-medium (P<0.001), medium-large (P<0.001), and small-large circle results (P<0.001) in all the groups for all parameters except NFI. CONCLUSIONS: Medium and large circles can also be used for RNFL evaluation in glaucoma. NFI is the best discriminating measure across all scan diameters.

Key concepts: Scanning laser polarimetry, Glaucoma, Nerve fiber layer, Medicine, Ophthalmology, Retinal, Laser, Optics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measurement by Scanning Laser Polarimetry (GDxVCC) at Conventional and Modified Diameter Scans in Normals, Glaucoma Suspects, and Early Glaucoma Patients — Research Paper | ScholarLens