2001Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil ScienceRequires access

Nitrogen mineralization in marsh meadows in relation to soil organic matter content and watertable level

Janez Hacin, J. Čop, Ivan Mahne

Open publisher page 33 citations

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to asses the effect of watertable level on N mineralization in a Histosol and a Humic Gleysol profile under natural meadows in Ljubljana marsh, Slovenia. The two soils differ significantly in organic matter content (27—40 % in Histosol and 14—20 % in Humic Gleysol) but not in C : N ratio (13—20) and pH (6.5—7.0). For each soil, the watertable was maintained at two levels (above or below 50 cm from the soil surface) for approximately one year. The four main plots, according to soil carbon content and watertable level were divided into 4 subplots, according to 4 fertilization treatments (unfertilized control, PK, PK + 50 kg N ha—1, PK + 3 × 50 kg N ha—1). Net N mineralization in unfertilized subplots was estimated from indices of N mineralization obtained by incubation of soil samples in the laboratory and by seasonal dynamics of mineral N content in the field. Annual uptake of N in herbage under the 4 fertilization treatments was also measured. Total mineral N content in topsoil was 20—80 % higher in Histosol than in Humic Gleysol. Similarly, aerobic N mineralization potentials along the entire soil profile (0—90 cm) were 20—130 % higher in Histosol than in Humic Gleysol. By contrast, anaerobic N mineralization potentials in subsoil were 10—60 % lower in Histosol than in Humic Gleysol. Both, aerobic and anaerobic N mineralization potentials strongly depended on watertable levels at sampling time. Seasonal dynamics of soil mineral N content as well as N mineralization potentials indicated that the N mineralization in the Histosol could be 10—40 % higher at low than at high watertable level. In the Humic Gleysol the N mineralization could be 10—100 % higher at high watertable level. Higher N availability in Histosol at low watertable and in Humic Gleysol at high watertable was also reflected in higher N uptake in herbage. These results indicate that N mineralization in Histosol and Humic Gleysol, was proportional to soil organic matter content, whereas in both soils, higher N mineralization rates can be expected at watertable levels between 40 and 60 cm below the soil surface, than at higher/lower watertable levels.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The objective of the present study was to asses the effect of watertable level on N mineralization in a Histosol and a Humic Gleysol profile under natural meadows in Ljubljana marsh, Slovenia. The two soils differ significantly in organic matter content (27—40 % in Histosol and 14—20 % in Humic Gleysol) but not in C : N ratio (13—20) and pH (6.5—7.0). For each soil, the watertable was maintained at two levels (above or below 50 cm from the soil surface) for approximately one year. The four main plots, according to soil carbon content and watertable level were divided into 4 subplots, according to 4 fertilization treatments (unfertilized control, PK, PK + 50 kg N ha—1, PK + 3 × 50 kg N ha—1). Net N mineralization in unfertilized subplots was estimated from indices of N mineralization obtained by incubation of soil samples in the laboratory and by seasonal dynamics of mineral N content in the field. Annual uptake of N in herbage under the 4 fertilization treatments was also measured. Total mineral N content in topsoil was 20—80 % higher in Histosol than in Humic Gleysol. Similarly, aerobic N mineralization potentials along the entire soil profile (0—90 cm) were 20—130 % higher in Histosol than in Humic Gleysol. By contrast, anaerobic N mineralization potentials in subsoil were 10—60 % lower in Histosol than in Humic Gleysol. Both, aerobic and anaerobic N mineralization potentials strongly depended on watertable levels at sampling time. Seasonal dynamics of soil mineral N content as well as N mineralization potentials indicated that the N mineralization in the Histosol could be 10—40 % higher at low than at high watertable level. In the Humic Gleysol the N mineralization could be 10—100 % higher at high watertable level. Higher N availability in Histosol at low watertable and in Humic Gleysol at high watertable was also reflected in higher N uptake in herbage. These results indicate that N mineralization in Histosol and Humic Gleysol, was proportional to soil organic matter content, whereas in both soils, higher N mineralization rates can be expected at watertable levels between 40 and 60 cm below the soil surface, than at higher/lower watertable levels.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 33 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The objective of the present study was to asses the effect of watertable level on N mineralization in a Histosol and a Humic Gleysol profile under natural meadows in Ljubljana marsh, Slovenia. The two soils differ significantly in organic matter content (27—40 % in Histosol and 14—20 % in Humic Gleysol) but not in C : N ratio (13—20) and pH (6.5—7.0). For each soil, the watertable was maintained at two levels (above or below 50 cm from the soil surface) for approximately one year. The four main plots, according to soil carbon content and watertable level were divided into 4 subplots, according to 4 fertilization treatments (unfertilized control, PK, PK + 50 kg N ha—1, PK + 3 × 50 kg N ha—1). Net N mineralization in unfertilized subplots was estimated from indices of N mineralization obtained by incubation of soil samples in the laboratory and by seasonal dynamics of mineral N content in the field. Annual uptake of N in herbage under the 4 fertilization treatments was also measured. Total mineral N content in topsoil was 20—80 % higher in Histosol than in Humic Gleysol. Similarly, aerobic N mineralization potentials along the entire soil profile (0—90 cm) were 20—130 % higher in Histosol than in Humic Gleysol. By contrast, anaerobic N mineralization potentials in subsoil were 10—60 % lower in Histosol than in Humic Gleysol. Both, aerobic and anaerobic N mineralization potentials strongly depended on watertable levels at sampling time. Seasonal dynamics of soil mineral N content as well as N mineralization potentials indicated that the N mineralization in the Histosol could be 10—40 % higher at low than at high watertable level. In the Humic Gleysol the N mineralization could be 10—100 % higher at high watertable level. Higher N availability in Histosol at low watertable and in Humic Gleysol at high watertable was also reflected in higher N uptake in herbage. These results indicate that N mineralization in Histosol and Humic Gleysol, was proportional to soil organic matter content, whereas in both soils, higher N mineralization rates can be expected at watertable levels between 40 and 60 cm below the soil surface, than at higher/lower watertable levels.

Key concepts: Gleysol, Histosol, Mineralization (soil science), Chemistry, Subsoil, Organic matter, Environmental chemistry, Soil water

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Nitrogen mineralization in marsh meadows in relation to soil organic matter content and watertable level — Research Paper | ScholarLens