1990•Land Degradation and DevelopmentRequires access

Amelioration of a calcareous saline‐sodic soil by gypsum and forage plants

Nazir Ahmad, Riaz Hussain Qureshi, Manzoor Qadir

Open publisher page 71 citations

Abstract

Abstract A field experiment was carried out at the University of Agriculture, Faisalabad (Pakistan) during 1988–90 to evaluate the comparative efficiency of chemical and biological methods for the reclamation of a calcareous saline‐sodic soil (pHs pHs = pH of saturated soil paste = 8.2–8.6; ECe ECe = Electrical conductivity of the saturation extract = 7.4–9.0 dS m−1; SAR SAR = Sodium adsorption ratio = 55.6–73.0 for upper 30 cm layer). Five treatments were assessed, three involved cropping: sesbania (Sesbania aculeata), sordan (Sorghum bicolor x Sorghum sudanese), and kallar grass (Leptochola fusca) and two were non‐cropped (control and gypsum at 100.0 per cent GR‐15·0 cm) were employed. Water of low electrolyte concentration (EC = 0.27 dS m−1) was used for irrigation and leaching. Sesbania and kallar grass were found to be effective biotic materials for soil reclamation. These plant species produced substantial biomass and also improved the soil environment by lowering the EC and SAR of the soil. Sordan was relatively less‐effective due to its sensitivity to high temperature and sodicity during germination and early seedling stages. After two cropping seasons, wheat (cultivar LU 26S) was sown as a test crop. Efficiency of treatments as indicated by wheat grain yield was in the order: sesbania = gypsum > kallar grass > sordan > control.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract A field experiment was carried out at the University of Agriculture, Faisalabad (Pakistan) during 1988–90 to evaluate the comparative efficiency of chemical and biological methods for the reclamation of a calcareous saline‐sodic soil (pHs pHs = pH of saturated soil paste = 8.2–8.6; ECe ECe = Electrical conductivity of the saturation extract = 7.4–9.0 dS m−1; SAR SAR = Sodium adsorption ratio = 55.6–73.0 for upper 30 cm layer). Five treatments were assessed, three involved cropping: sesbania (Sesbania aculeata), sordan (Sorghum bicolor x Sorghum sudanese), and kallar grass (Leptochola fusca) and two were non‐cropped (control and gypsum at 100.0 per cent GR‐15·0 cm) were employed. Water of low electrolyte concentration (EC = 0.27 dS m−1) was used for irrigation and leaching. Sesbania and kallar grass were found to be effective biotic materials for soil reclamation. These plant species produced substantial biomass and also improved the soil environment by lowering the EC and SAR of the soil. Sordan was relatively less‐effective due to its sensitivity to high temperature and sodicity during germination and early seedling stages. After two cropping seasons, wheat (cultivar LU 26S) was sown as a test crop. Efficiency of treatments as indicated by wheat grain yield was in the order: sesbania = gypsum > kallar grass > sordan > control.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 71 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract A field experiment was carried out at the University of Agriculture, Faisalabad (Pakistan) during 1988–90 to evaluate the comparative efficiency of chemical and biological methods for the reclamation of a calcareous saline‐sodic soil (pHs pHs = pH of saturated soil paste = 8.2–8.6; ECe ECe = Electrical conductivity of the saturation extract = 7.4–9.0 dS m−1; SAR SAR = Sodium adsorption ratio = 55.6–73.0 for upper 30 cm layer). Five treatments were assessed, three involved cropping: sesbania (Sesbania aculeata), sordan (Sorghum bicolor x Sorghum sudanese), and kallar grass (Leptochola fusca) and two were non‐cropped (control and gypsum at 100.0 per cent GR‐15·0 cm) were employed. Water of low electrolyte concentration (EC = 0.27 dS m−1) was used for irrigation and leaching. Sesbania and kallar grass were found to be effective biotic materials for soil reclamation. These plant species produced substantial biomass and also improved the soil environment by lowering the EC and SAR of the soil. Sordan was relatively less‐effective due to its sensitivity to high temperature and sodicity during germination and early seedling stages. After two cropping seasons, wheat (cultivar LU 26S) was sown as a test crop. Efficiency of treatments as indicated by wheat grain yield was in the order: sesbania = gypsum > kallar grass > sordan > control.

Key concepts: Sesbania, Sodium adsorption ratio, Agronomy, Sodic soil, Calcareous, Sorghum, Environmental science, Leaching (pedology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Amelioration of a calcareous saline‐sodic soil by gypsum and forage plants — Research Paper | ScholarLens