2015Geosynthetics InternationalRequires access

Interface transmissivity and hydraulic conductivity of GCLs below poured concrete

R. Kerry Rowe, Mohamed Hosney

Open publisher page 12 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The performance of four geosynthetic clay liners (GCLs) used as a hydraulic barrier below concrete-lined sewage treatment lagoons was examined based on a series of laboratory tests aimed at measuring: (i) the lateral flow of synthetic wastewater through the interface between each GCL product and a 0.1 m thick cast-in-place concrete above the GCL over a 14-month period and, from this data, calculating the concrete/GCL interface transmissivity (θ); and (ii) the hydraulic conductivity (k) of the GCLs below poured concrete when exposed to (iia) synthetic wastewater under isothermal conditions, or (iib) a series of wet–dry and/or cool–heat cycles for up to 12 months. The four GCLs have either sodium or polymer-enhanced sodium bentonite, and either granular or powdered bentonite. When the wastewater head above the GCL was 1.0 m (stress on concrete, σ = 10 kPa), θ for the GCL with granular sodium bentonite was 4 × 10−11 m2/s. For the same GCL, when the head increased to 2.5 m (σ = 25 kPa), the value of θ was reduced by about one order of magnitude to 2 × 10−12 m2/s. For the GCL which has polymer-enhanced granular bentonite, the value of θ was similar to (and possibly lower than) that for the GCL with untreated granular bentonite. For the GCL with powdered bentonite and cover geotextile impregnated with 1280 g/m2 of bentonite, the values of θ were 2 × 10−12 and 4 × 10−13 m2/s at 1.0 and 2.5 m head, respectively. With a reduction in the amount of the impregnated powdered bentonite in the cover geotextile to 840 g/m2, θ was 1 to 9 × 10−12 m2/s. The lowest k (3.2 × 10−11 m/s) for a GCL below concrete and exposed to wastewater under isothermal conditions was measured for the GCL with polymer-enhanced granular bentonite, whereas the highest value of k (1.9 × 10−10 m/s) was for the GCL with standard granular bentonite. Under 0.5 m head and 3 kPa stress, the k of the GCL below concrete and exposed to wet–dry cycles was 1.2–2.6 times the k of the GCL exposed to wastewater under isothermal conditions. Analytical calculations for the leakage through concrete/GCL liners for the four GCLs showed that the leakage was below the allowable limits specified by the Australian, British, and American standards.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

ABSTRACT: The performance of four geosynthetic clay liners (GCLs) used as a hydraulic barrier below concrete-lined sewage treatment lagoons was examined based on a series of laboratory tests aimed at measuring: (i) the lateral flow of synthetic wastewater through the interface between each GCL product and a 0.1 m thick cast-in-place concrete above the GCL over a 14-month period and, from this data, calculating the concrete/GCL interface transmissivity (θ); and (ii) the hydraulic conductivity (k) of the GCLs below poured concrete when exposed to (iia) synthetic wastewater under isothermal conditions, or (iib) a series of wet–dry and/or cool–heat cycles for up to 12 months. The four GCLs have either sodium or polymer-enhanced sodium bentonite, and either granular or powdered bentonite. When the wastewater head above the GCL was 1.0 m (stress on concrete, σ = 10 kPa), θ for the GCL with granular sodium bentonite was 4 × 10−11 m2/s. For the same GCL, when the head increased to 2.5 m (σ = 25 kPa), the value of θ was reduced by about one order of magnitude to 2 × 10−12 m2/s. For the GCL which has polymer-enhanced granular bentonite, the value of θ was similar to (and possibly lower than) that for the GCL with untreated granular bentonite. For the GCL with powdered bentonite and cover geotextile impregnated with 1280 g/m2 of bentonite, the values of θ were 2 × 10−12 and 4 × 10−13 m2/s at 1.0 and 2.5 m head, respectively. With a reduction in the amount of the impregnated powdered bentonite in the cover geotextile to 840 g/m2, θ was 1 to 9 × 10−12 m2/s. The lowest k (3.2 × 10−11 m/s) for a GCL below concrete and exposed to wastewater under isothermal conditions was measured for the GCL with polymer-enhanced granular bentonite, whereas the highest value of k (1.9 × 10−10 m/s) was for the GCL with standard granular bentonite. Under 0.5 m head and 3 kPa stress, the k of the GCL below concrete and exposed to wet–dry cycles was 1.2–2.6 times the k of the GCL exposed to wastewater under isothermal conditions. Analytical calculations for the leakage through concrete/GCL liners for the four GCLs showed that the leakage was below the allowable limits specified by the Australian, British, and American standards.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

ABSTRACT: The performance of four geosynthetic clay liners (GCLs) used as a hydraulic barrier below concrete-lined sewage treatment lagoons was examined based on a series of laboratory tests aimed at measuring: (i) the lateral flow of synthetic wastewater through the interface between each GCL product and a 0.1 m thick cast-in-place concrete above the GCL over a 14-month period and, from this data, calculating the concrete/GCL interface transmissivity (θ); and (ii) the hydraulic conductivity (k) of the GCLs below poured concrete when exposed to (iia) synthetic wastewater under isothermal conditions, or (iib) a series of wet–dry and/or cool–heat cycles for up to 12 months. The four GCLs have either sodium or polymer-enhanced sodium bentonite, and either granular or powdered bentonite. When the wastewater head above the GCL was 1.0 m (stress on concrete, σ = 10 kPa), θ for the GCL with granular sodium bentonite was 4 × 10−11 m2/s. For the same GCL, when the head increased to 2.5 m (σ = 25 kPa), the value of θ was reduced by about one order of magnitude to 2 × 10−12 m2/s. For the GCL which has polymer-enhanced granular bentonite, the value of θ was similar to (and possibly lower than) that for the GCL with untreated granular bentonite. For the GCL with powdered bentonite and cover geotextile impregnated with 1280 g/m2 of bentonite, the values of θ were 2 × 10−12 and 4 × 10−13 m2/s at 1.0 and 2.5 m head, respectively. With a reduction in the amount of the impregnated powdered bentonite in the cover geotextile to 840 g/m2, θ was 1 to 9 × 10−12 m2/s. The lowest k (3.2 × 10−11 m/s) for a GCL below concrete and exposed to wastewater under isothermal conditions was measured for the GCL with polymer-enhanced granular bentonite, whereas the highest value of k (1.9 × 10−10 m/s) was for the GCL with standard granular bentonite. Under 0.5 m head and 3 kPa stress, the k of the GCL below concrete and exposed to wet–dry cycles was 1.2–2.6 times the k of the GCL exposed to wastewater under isothermal conditions. Analytical calculations for the leakage through concrete/GCL liners for the four GCLs showed that the leakage was below the allowable limits specified by the Australian, British, and American standards.

Key concepts: Geosynthetic clay liner, Bentonite, Geosynthetics, Hydraulic conductivity, Geotextile, Materials science, Geotechnical engineering, Composite material

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Interface transmissivity and hydraulic conductivity of GCLs below poured concrete — Research Paper | ScholarLens