2005Journal of Psychology in AfricaRequires access

Understanding and predicting students' dishonesty: development of a measure of dishonest and unreliable behaviours

Julius Fred Kikooma, John C. Munene, Paul Nyende, Grace Kibanja

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

In this paper we present findings from a study that was designed, based on a cheating experiment conducted to a sample of 390 university students in an examination situation. We discuss the development of a local (Ugandan) measure of attitudes towards honesty, which can be used for assessing aspects of dishonest and unreliable behaviour among individuals. We hypothesised that individuals with favourable attitudes toward theft and other forms of dishonesty are more likely to be involved in dishonest acts. Results show that the measure that we developed is a valid predictor of a person's level of honesty and has significant correlations with other well known and validated measures of such personality profiles. Secondly, we hypothesised that individuals with low levels of socialisation, as measured by Gough's 1987 revised socialisation scale, or a history of delinquency, are more likely to be involved in dishonesty. The findings indicate substantial evidence for the above two relationships. By using the results obtained from the study, it is possible to identify items from the local honesty scale that can be used to identify more honest people and less honest ones. Keywords: academic honesty, cheating, honesty, socialisationJournal of Psychology in Africa 2005, 15(1): 81–87

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this paper we present findings from a study that was designed, based on a cheating experiment conducted to a sample of 390 university students in an examination situation. We discuss the development of a local (Ugandan) measure of attitudes towards honesty, which can be used for assessing aspects of dishonest and unreliable behaviour among individuals. We hypothesised that individuals with favourable attitudes toward theft and other forms of dishonesty are more likely to be involved in dishonest acts. Results show that the measure that we developed is a valid predictor of a person's level of honesty and has significant correlations with other well known and validated measures of such personality profiles. Secondly, we hypothesised that individuals with low levels of socialisation, as measured by Gough's 1987 revised socialisation scale, or a history of delinquency, are more likely to be involved in dishonesty. The findings indicate substantial evidence for the above two relationships. By using the results obtained from the study, it is possible to identify items from the local honesty scale that can be used to identify more honest people and less honest ones. Keywords: academic honesty, cheating, honesty, socialisationJournal of Psychology in Africa 2005, 15(1): 81–87

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this paper we present findings from a study that was designed, based on a cheating experiment conducted to a sample of 390 university students in an examination situation. We discuss the development of a local (Ugandan) measure of attitudes towards honesty, which can be used for assessing aspects of dishonest and unreliable behaviour among individuals. We hypothesised that individuals with favourable attitudes toward theft and other forms of dishonesty are more likely to be involved in dishonest acts. Results show that the measure that we developed is a valid predictor of a person's level of honesty and has significant correlations with other well known and validated measures of such personality profiles. Secondly, we hypothesised that individuals with low levels of socialisation, as measured by Gough's 1987 revised socialisation scale, or a history of delinquency, are more likely to be involved in dishonesty. The findings indicate substantial evidence for the above two relationships. By using the results obtained from the study, it is possible to identify items from the local honesty scale that can be used to identify more honest people and less honest ones. Keywords: academic honesty, cheating, honesty, socialisationJournal of Psychology in Africa 2005, 15(1): 81–87

Key concepts: Cheating, Honesty, Dishonesty, Psychology, Academic dishonesty, Social psychology, Personality, Scale (ratio)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Understanding and predicting students' dishonesty: development of a measure of dishonest and unreliable behaviours — Research Paper | ScholarLens