1972Journal of Symbolic LogicRequires access

The inconsistency of a certain axiom system for set theory

James Delbert Davis

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

We prove in this paper that the -system, an axiom system for set theory suggested for investigation by Takeuti in [2], is inconsistent. We also show that this system without the ω-rule is consistent if Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory with the axiom of choice and an axiom due to Reinhardt and Silver is consistent. The -system is an effort to strengthen Bernays-Gödel set theory by adding a reflection principle. In addition to the standard notation of set theory, we write X″{x) to mean {y∣〈x, y〉 Є X}.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We prove in this paper that the -system, an axiom system for set theory suggested for investigation by Takeuti in [2], is inconsistent. We also show that this system without the ω-rule is consistent if Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory with the axiom of choice and an axiom due to Reinhardt and Silver is consistent. The -system is an effort to strengthen Bernays-Gödel set theory by adding a reflection principle. In addition to the standard notation of set theory, we write X″{x) to mean {y∣〈x, y〉 Є X}.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We prove in this paper that the -system, an axiom system for set theory suggested for investigation by Takeuti in [2], is inconsistent. We also show that this system without the ω-rule is consistent if Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory with the axiom of choice and an axiom due to Reinhardt and Silver is consistent. The -system is an effort to strengthen Bernays-Gödel set theory by adding a reflection principle. In addition to the standard notation of set theory, we write X″{x) to mean {y∣〈x, y〉 Є X}.

Key concepts: Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory, Axiom of choice, Urelement, Constructive set theory, Set theory, Axiom, Notation, Mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The inconsistency of a certain axiom system for set theory — Research Paper | ScholarLens