The inconsistency of a certain axiom system for set theory
James Delbert Davis
Abstract
James Delbert Davis
Abstract
We prove in this paper that the -system, an axiom system for set theory suggested for investigation by Takeuti in [2], is inconsistent. We also show that this system without the ω-rule is consistent if Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory with the axiom of choice and an axiom due to Reinhardt and Silver is consistent. The -system is an effort to strengthen Bernays-Gödel set theory by adding a reflection principle. In addition to the standard notation of set theory, we write X″{x) to mean {y∣〈x, y〉 Є X}.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We prove in this paper that the -system, an axiom system for set theory suggested for investigation by Takeuti in [2], is inconsistent. We also show that this system without the ω-rule is consistent if Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory with the axiom of choice and an axiom due to Reinhardt and Silver is consistent. The -system is an effort to strengthen Bernays-Gödel set theory by adding a reflection principle. In addition to the standard notation of set theory, we write X″{x) to mean {y∣〈x, y〉 Є X}.
Key concepts: Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory, Axiom of choice, Urelement, Constructive set theory, Set theory, Axiom, Notation, Mathematics