Need for standardization of psychoacoustics.
Klaus Genuit
Abstract
Klaus Genuit
Abstract
In the last decades, psychoacoustic parameters gained more and more importance in the context of sound perception and assessment in various applications. In particular, loudness was introduced as a better parameter than A-weighted level, because it shows a much better correspondence with the subjective impression of “volume” (loudness). This parameter was the object of standardization in the last years and few loudness standards were established (DIN 45631/A1, ISO 532, ANSI S3.4). The calculation of sharpness is also standardized (DIN 45692) and the standardization of roughness is recently under consideration by the DIN. These efforts have led to a global acceptance and a widespread use of psychoacoustic parameters in the automotive and IT-field. However, since the human signal processing is complex and the development of valid calculation models difficult, psychoacoustic phenomena must further be studied. Moreover, the validity, accuracy, and applicability of psychoacoustic parameters to specific noises must be determined. Especially, in the context of the description and classification of environmental noise, the potential of psychoacoustics has not been fully used so far. This paper will show the current status of standardization of psychoacoustics and will discuss the needs for the future.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In the last decades, psychoacoustic parameters gained more and more importance in the context of sound perception and assessment in various applications. In particular, loudness was introduced as a better parameter than A-weighted level, because it shows a much better correspondence with the subjective impression of “volume” (loudness). This parameter was the object of standardization in the last years and few loudness standards were established (DIN 45631/A1, ISO 532, ANSI S3.4). The calculation of sharpness is also standardized (DIN 45692) and the standardization of roughness is recently under consideration by the DIN. These efforts have led to a global acceptance and a widespread use of psychoacoustic parameters in the automotive and IT-field. However, since the human signal processing is complex and the development of valid calculation models difficult, psychoacoustic phenomena must further be studied. Moreover, the validity, accuracy, and applicability of psychoacoustic parameters to specific noises must be determined. Especially, in the context of the description and classification of environmental noise, the potential of psychoacoustics has not been fully used so far. This paper will show the current status of standardization of psychoacoustics and will discuss the needs for the future.
Key concepts: Psychoacoustics, Loudness, Standardization, Context (archaeology), Computer science, Generality, Noise (video), Acoustics