2007•Industrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchRequires access

Multi-Objective Optimization of Pressure Swing Adsorbers for Air Separation

B. Sankararao, Santosh K. Gupta

Open publisher page 36 citations

Abstract

Multi-objective optimization of the operation of a two-fixed-bed, four-stage pressure swing adsorber (PSA) unit for the separation of air is studied using the newly developed multi-objective optimization technique, the modified MOSA-aJG. The rigorous model developed for a single fixed-bed adsorption column is applicable to PSA units provided different and appropriate boundary and initial conditions are used for the four stages, namely, pressurization, adsorption, blowdown, and purge. Seven of the nine model parameters are the same as obtained earlier for a single-bed O 2 −N 2 −Zeolite 5A unit. The remaining two parameters are tuned using one set of experimental data on a PSA unit with the same system. Reasonably good agreement is observed between simulation and experimental results. Two two-objective optimization problems and a four-objective problem are formulated for the operation of a PSA. These are solved to obtain optimal values of the adsorption pressure, desorption pressure, adsorption and purge times, and input flow rates during the adsorption and purge stages. The effects of different decision variables on the several objective functions are discussed in detail.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Multi-objective optimization of the operation of a two-fixed-bed, four-stage pressure swing adsorber (PSA) unit for the separation of air is studied using the newly developed multi-objective optimization technique, the modified MOSA-aJG. The rigorous model developed for a single fixed-bed adsorption column is applicable to PSA units provided different and appropriate boundary and initial conditions are used for the four stages, namely, pressurization, adsorption, blowdown, and purge. Seven of the nine model parameters are the same as obtained earlier for a single-bed O 2 −N 2 −Zeolite 5A unit. The remaining two parameters are tuned using one set of experimental data on a PSA unit with the same system. Reasonably good agreement is observed between simulation and experimental results. Two two-objective optimization problems and a four-objective problem are formulated for the operation of a PSA. These are solved to obtain optimal values of the adsorption pressure, desorption pressure, adsorption and purge times, and input flow rates during the adsorption and purge stages. The effects of different decision variables on the several objective functions are discussed in detail.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 36 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Multi-objective optimization of the operation of a two-fixed-bed, four-stage pressure swing adsorber (PSA) unit for the separation of air is studied using the newly developed multi-objective optimization technique, the modified MOSA-aJG. The rigorous model developed for a single fixed-bed adsorption column is applicable to PSA units provided different and appropriate boundary and initial conditions are used for the four stages, namely, pressurization, adsorption, blowdown, and purge. Seven of the nine model parameters are the same as obtained earlier for a single-bed O 2 −N 2 −Zeolite 5A unit. The remaining two parameters are tuned using one set of experimental data on a PSA unit with the same system. Reasonably good agreement is observed between simulation and experimental results. Two two-objective optimization problems and a four-objective problem are formulated for the operation of a PSA. These are solved to obtain optimal values of the adsorption pressure, desorption pressure, adsorption and purge times, and input flow rates during the adsorption and purge stages. The effects of different decision variables on the several objective functions are discussed in detail.

Key concepts: Purge, Pressure swing adsorption, Air separation, Boiler blowdown, Adsorption, Cabin pressurization, Desorption, Chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Multi-Objective Optimization of Pressure Swing Adsorbers for Air Separation — Research Paper | ScholarLens