2001Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardRequires access

Highway Capacity Analysis After Highway Capacity Manual 2000

Wayne Kittelson, Roger P. Roess

Open publisher page 24 citations

Abstract

The publication of the “fourth” full edition of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) in the fall of 2000 represented a major step forward in state-of-the-art highway capacity and quality-of-service analyses. Even as this major step is taken, however, old issues reemerge and new ones arise as to the core concepts involved, the directions that such analyses should take in the future, and the needs of HCM users. Now that HCM has begun to address system and multimodal measures, the nature and meaning of capacity and level-of-service concepts need to be reexamined. The role of simulation must be more clearly defined, as must the limitations of more conventional highway capacity analyses. As databases improve, the question of statistical accuracy and stochastic variations in standard measures may seem more important, even though the inherent variability in traffic flow characteristics remains essentially unchanged. The need for software to implement ever more complex methodologies raises additional issues. As the Committee on Highway Capacity and Quality of Service and its members consider these and other important issues, an attempt to outline the major issues and alternatives that should be examined is made. In addition, some suggestions as to potential paths to follow are provided.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The publication of the “fourth” full edition of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) in the fall of 2000 represented a major step forward in state-of-the-art highway capacity and quality-of-service analyses. Even as this major step is taken, however, old issues reemerge and new ones arise as to the core concepts involved, the directions that such analyses should take in the future, and the needs of HCM users. Now that HCM has begun to address system and multimodal measures, the nature and meaning of capacity and level-of-service concepts need to be reexamined. The role of simulation must be more clearly defined, as must the limitations of more conventional highway capacity analyses. As databases improve, the question of statistical accuracy and stochastic variations in standard measures may seem more important, even though the inherent variability in traffic flow characteristics remains essentially unchanged. The need for software to implement ever more complex methodologies raises additional issues. As the Committee on Highway Capacity and Quality of Service and its members consider these and other important issues, an attempt to outline the major issues and alternatives that should be examined is made. In addition, some suggestions as to potential paths to follow are provided.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 24 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The publication of the “fourth” full edition of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) in the fall of 2000 represented a major step forward in state-of-the-art highway capacity and quality-of-service analyses. Even as this major step is taken, however, old issues reemerge and new ones arise as to the core concepts involved, the directions that such analyses should take in the future, and the needs of HCM users. Now that HCM has begun to address system and multimodal measures, the nature and meaning of capacity and level-of-service concepts need to be reexamined. The role of simulation must be more clearly defined, as must the limitations of more conventional highway capacity analyses. As databases improve, the question of statistical accuracy and stochastic variations in standard measures may seem more important, even though the inherent variability in traffic flow characteristics remains essentially unchanged. The need for software to implement ever more complex methodologies raises additional issues. As the Committee on Highway Capacity and Quality of Service and its members consider these and other important issues, an attempt to outline the major issues and alternatives that should be examined is made. In addition, some suggestions as to potential paths to follow are provided.

Key concepts: Highway Capacity Manual, Level of service, Transport engineering, Service (business), Quality (philosophy), Risk analysis (engineering), Computer science, Meaning (existential)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Highway Capacity Analysis After Highway Capacity Manual 2000 — Research Paper | ScholarLens