1991The Philosophical ReviewRequires access

Kant and the Claims of Knowledge.

T. H. Irwin, Paul Guyer

Open publisher page 340 citations

Abstract

Acknowledgments Notes on sources Introduction Part I. Kant's Early View: 1. The problem of objective validity 2. The transcendental theory of experience: 1774-1775 Part II. The Transcendental Deduction from 1781 to 1787: 3. The real premises of the deduction 4. The deduction from knowledge of objects 5. The deduction and aperception Part III. The Principles of Empirical Knowledge: 6. The schematism and system of principles 7. Axioms and anticipations 8. The general principle of the analogies 9. The first analogy: substance 10. The second analogy: causation 11. The third analogy: interaction Part IV. The Refutation of Idealism: 12. The problem, project, and promise of the refutation 13. The central arguments of the refutation 14. The metaphysics of the refutation Part V. Transcendental Idealism: 15. Appearances and things in themselves 16. Transcendental idealism and the forms of intuition 17. Transcendental idealism and the theory of judgment 18. Transcendental idealism and the 'Antinomy of Pure Reason' Afterword Notes General index.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Acknowledgments Notes on sources Introduction Part I. Kant's Early View: 1. The problem of objective validity 2. The transcendental theory of experience: 1774-1775 Part II. The Transcendental Deduction from 1781 to 1787: 3. The real premises of the deduction 4. The deduction from knowledge of objects 5. The deduction and aperception Part III. The Principles of Empirical Knowledge: 6. The schematism and system of principles 7. Axioms and anticipations 8. The general principle of the analogies 9. The first analogy: substance 10. The second analogy: causation 11. The third analogy: interaction Part IV. The Refutation of Idealism: 12. The problem, project, and promise of the refutation 13. The central arguments of the refutation 14. The metaphysics of the refutation Part V. Transcendental Idealism: 15. Appearances and things in themselves 16. Transcendental idealism and the forms of intuition 17. Transcendental idealism and the theory of judgment 18. Transcendental idealism and the 'Antinomy of Pure Reason' Afterword Notes General index.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 340 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Acknowledgments Notes on sources Introduction Part I. Kant's Early View: 1. The problem of objective validity 2. The transcendental theory of experience: 1774-1775 Part II. The Transcendental Deduction from 1781 to 1787: 3. The real premises of the deduction 4. The deduction from knowledge of objects 5. The deduction and aperception Part III. The Principles of Empirical Knowledge: 6. The schematism and system of principles 7. Axioms and anticipations 8. The general principle of the analogies 9. The first analogy: substance 10. The second analogy: causation 11. The third analogy: interaction Part IV. The Refutation of Idealism: 12. The problem, project, and promise of the refutation 13. The central arguments of the refutation 14. The metaphysics of the refutation Part V. Transcendental Idealism: 15. Appearances and things in themselves 16. Transcendental idealism and the forms of intuition 17. Transcendental idealism and the theory of judgment 18. Transcendental idealism and the 'Antinomy of Pure Reason' Afterword Notes General index.

Key concepts: General interest, Philosophy, Contemporary philosophy, Epistemology, Analytic philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Kant and the Claims of Knowledge. — Research Paper | ScholarLens