1990Journal of Structural EngineeringRequires access

Bridge Testing—A Surprise Every Time

Baidar Bakht, Leslie G. Jaeger

Open publisher page 121 citations

Abstract

Experience with field testing of highway bridges in Ontario, Canada, during recent years shows that nearly every bridge has some aspect of behavior that can escape the attention of even experienced bridge designers and analysts. This paper lists some of the various surprises encountered in bridge testing that may have a significant influence on the load‐carrying capacities of bridges. In particular, reference is made to the behavior of bridges with steel girders and concrete deck slabs, and of steel truss bridges. Lessons drawn from tests on these bridges are summarized, so they can provide an advantage in the load‐carrying capacity evaluation. It is also shown that in some cases the appearance of a bridge can be misleading with regard to its true load‐carrying capacity. In such cases, field testing is shown to be the most effective means of evaluating the bridge.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Experience with field testing of highway bridges in Ontario, Canada, during recent years shows that nearly every bridge has some aspect of behavior that can escape the attention of even experienced bridge designers and analysts. This paper lists some of the various surprises encountered in bridge testing that may have a significant influence on the load‐carrying capacities of bridges. In particular, reference is made to the behavior of bridges with steel girders and concrete deck slabs, and of steel truss bridges. Lessons drawn from tests on these bridges are summarized, so they can provide an advantage in the load‐carrying capacity evaluation. It is also shown that in some cases the appearance of a bridge can be misleading with regard to its true load‐carrying capacity. In such cases, field testing is shown to be the most effective means of evaluating the bridge.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 121 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Experience with field testing of highway bridges in Ontario, Canada, during recent years shows that nearly every bridge has some aspect of behavior that can escape the attention of even experienced bridge designers and analysts. This paper lists some of the various surprises encountered in bridge testing that may have a significant influence on the load‐carrying capacities of bridges. In particular, reference is made to the behavior of bridges with steel girders and concrete deck slabs, and of steel truss bridges. Lessons drawn from tests on these bridges are summarized, so they can provide an advantage in the load‐carrying capacity evaluation. It is also shown that in some cases the appearance of a bridge can be misleading with regard to its true load‐carrying capacity. In such cases, field testing is shown to be the most effective means of evaluating the bridge.

Key concepts: Bridge (graph theory), Surprise, Structural engineering, Truss bridge, Engineering, Load testing, Deck, Truss

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Bridge Testing—A Surprise Every Time — Research Paper | ScholarLens