A comparison between the Monte Carlo shell model method and the Monte Carlo spectroscopic method
G. Puddu
Abstract
Open-access reader
G. Puddu
Abstract
Open-access reader
A comparison is made between a variant of the Monte Carlo shell model method and the recently introduced Monte Carlo spectroscopic method. While the first method optimally determines a many-body shell model basis in which the Hamiltonian is diagonalized, and therefore relies on the determination of the most relevant part of the nuclear wavefunction, the second method stochastically samples observables including the full Hilbert space. Agreement is found between the two methods.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A comparison is made between a variant of the Monte Carlo shell model method and the recently introduced Monte Carlo spectroscopic method. While the first method optimally determines a many-body shell model basis in which the Hamiltonian is diagonalized, and therefore relies on the determination of the most relevant part of the nuclear wavefunction, the second method stochastically samples observables including the full Hilbert space. Agreement is found between the two methods.
Key concepts: Monte Carlo method, Hybrid Monte Carlo, Monte Carlo molecular modeling, Dynamic Monte Carlo method, Monte Carlo method in statistical physics, Statistical physics, Quantum Monte Carlo, SHELL model