CFAR detection of fluctuating targets in spatially correlated K-distributed clutter
B.C. Armstrong, Hugh Griffiths
Abstract
B.C. Armstrong, Hugh Griffiths
Abstract
The problem of single pulse CFAR detection of Rayleigh fluctuating targets in Kdistributed sea clutter is addressed. The performance of three types of well known CFAR processors, namely the cell averaging (CA), cell averaging greatest of (CAGO), and order statistic (OS) CFAR processors, is examined under varying conditions of clutter spatial correlation for several cases of desired false alarm probability and the number of reference cells used in the CFAR processor. Curves for the detectability loss due to the ‘spikiness’ of the clutter are presented and values for the additional loss due to CFAR thresholding are tabulated. The effects of incorrectly estimating the clutter shape parameter v are investigated. A model is presented to facilitate numerical analysis of detection performance under conditions of partial correlation of the clutter modulation process. Sample results are presented and it is shown that for the CFAR processors analysed here detection performance will not in general be dramatically improved relative to the worst case condition of spatially uncorrelated clutter.
OpenAlex reports 93 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The problem of single pulse CFAR detection of Rayleigh fluctuating targets in Kdistributed sea clutter is addressed. The performance of three types of well known CFAR processors, namely the cell averaging (CA), cell averaging greatest of (CAGO), and order statistic (OS) CFAR processors, is examined under varying conditions of clutter spatial correlation for several cases of desired false alarm probability and the number of reference cells used in the CFAR processor. Curves for the detectability loss due to the ‘spikiness’ of the clutter are presented and values for the additional loss due to CFAR thresholding are tabulated. The effects of incorrectly estimating the clutter shape parameter v are investigated. A model is presented to facilitate numerical analysis of detection performance under conditions of partial correlation of the clutter modulation process. Sample results are presented and it is shown that for the CFAR processors analysed here detection performance will not in general be dramatically improved relative to the worst case condition of spatially uncorrelated clutter.
Key concepts: Clutter, Constant false alarm rate, Thresholding, Computer science, Statistic, Algorithm, False alarm, Pattern recognition (psychology)