ScholarLens Back to search
2005•International Criminal Law ReviewRequires access

The Development of the Concept of Joint Criminal Enterprise at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia

Verena Haan

Open publisher page 37 citations

Abstract

International Criminal Law Review 5: 167–201, 2005. 167 © 2005 Koninklijke Brill NV. Printed in the Netherlands. 1 Article 7(1) reads: “a person who planned, instigated, ordered, committed or otherwise aided and abetted in the planning, preparation or execution of a crime referred to in articles 2 to 5 of the present Statue, shall be individually responsible for the crime.” 2 ICTY-Appeals Chamber, Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadic a/k/a Dule, Judgment (Case No. IT-94- 12-A), 15.7.1999 (in the following: Tadic Appeal Judgment), para. 185–236. It should be men- tioned that earlier Trial decisions already used terms such as “common purpose” or

About this research paper

What this paper is about

International Criminal Law Review 5: 167–201, 2005. 167 © 2005 Koninklijke Brill NV. Printed in the Netherlands. 1 Article 7(1) reads: “a person who planned, instigated, ordered, committed or otherwise aided and abetted in the planning, preparation or execution of a crime referred to in articles 2 to 5 of the present Statue, shall be individually responsible for the crime.” 2 ICTY-Appeals Chamber, Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadic a/k/a Dule, Judgment (Case No. IT-94- 12-A), 15.7.1999 (in the following: Tadic Appeal Judgment), para. 185–236. It should be men- tioned that earlier Trial decisions already used terms such as “common purpose” or

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 37 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

International Criminal Law Review 5: 167–201, 2005. 167 © 2005 Koninklijke Brill NV. Printed in the Netherlands. 1 Article 7(1) reads: “a person who planned, instigated, ordered, committed or otherwise aided and abetted in the planning, preparation or execution of a crime referred to in articles 2 to 5 of the present Statue, shall be individually responsible for the crime.” 2 ICTY-Appeals Chamber, Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadic a/k/a Dule, Judgment (Case No. IT-94- 12-A), 15.7.1999 (in the following: Tadic Appeal Judgment), para. 185–236. It should be men- tioned that earlier Trial decisions already used terms such as “common purpose” or

Key concepts: Tribunal, Appeal, Law, Political science, Criminal procedure

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Development of the Concept of Joint Criminal Enterprise at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia — Research Paper | ScholarLens