Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
Narmada P. Gupta, Pawan Kesarwani, Rajiv Goel, Monish Aron
Abstract
Narmada P. Gupta, Pawan Kesarwani, Rajiv Goel, Monish Aron
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: To assess the efficacy, safety and morbidity of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and fifty-two patients with renal and upper ureteric calculi were included in this study. Sixty-nine patients (71 renal units; group 1) in whom no nephrostomy tube was placed at the conclusion of the procedure was compared with a similar control group of 83 patients (group 2) in whom a nephrostomy tube was placed. Operating time, blood loss, analgesia requirement, puncture site urinary leakage, hospital stay and mean convalescence period were compared in both groups. RESULTS: Both groups were similar with respect to age, sex distribution and stone size. Operating time and blood loss were less in group 1 although they did not reach statistical significance. The mean analgesic requirement, puncture site urinary leakage and hospital stay were significantly less in group 1. CONCLUSION: Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a safe and effective procedure in this selected group of patients.
OpenAlex reports 30 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
INTRODUCTION: To assess the efficacy, safety and morbidity of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and fifty-two patients with renal and upper ureteric calculi were included in this study. Sixty-nine patients (71 renal units; group 1) in whom no nephrostomy tube was placed at the conclusion of the procedure was compared with a similar control group of 83 patients (group 2) in whom a nephrostomy tube was placed. Operating time, blood loss, analgesia requirement, puncture site urinary leakage, hospital stay and mean convalescence period were compared in both groups. RESULTS: Both groups were similar with respect to age, sex distribution and stone size. Operating time and blood loss were less in group 1 although they did not reach statistical significance. The mean analgesic requirement, puncture site urinary leakage and hospital stay were significantly less in group 1. CONCLUSION: Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a safe and effective procedure in this selected group of patients.
Key concepts: Medicine, Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, Lithotomy position, Percutaneous, Urology, Surgery, General surgery, Pathology