2008International Journal of Aviation PsychologyRequires access

Analysis of General Aviation Crashes in Australia Using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System

Michael G. Lenné, Karen Ashby, Michael Fitzharris

Open publisher page 64 citations

Abstract

General aviation accidents represent 70% to 90% of all aviation accidents. Human error is implicated as a contributory factor in 85% of these crashes. General aviation crashes (N = 169) were analyzed using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) to elucidate the role of error in Australian crashes. Aircrew were more likely to commit skill-based and decision errors in the presence of substandard personal readiness, physical and mental limitations, and adverse mental states. Violations were associated with the presence of crew resource management failures. Reconfiguring the assessment of crashes by aviation insurers will further support analyses consistent with the systems approaches to accident investigation and comparison with other accident data sources.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

General aviation accidents represent 70% to 90% of all aviation accidents. Human error is implicated as a contributory factor in 85% of these crashes. General aviation crashes (N = 169) were analyzed using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) to elucidate the role of error in Australian crashes. Aircrew were more likely to commit skill-based and decision errors in the presence of substandard personal readiness, physical and mental limitations, and adverse mental states. Violations were associated with the presence of crew resource management failures. Reconfiguring the assessment of crashes by aviation insurers will further support analyses consistent with the systems approaches to accident investigation and comparison with other accident data sources.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 64 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

General aviation accidents represent 70% to 90% of all aviation accidents. Human error is implicated as a contributory factor in 85% of these crashes. General aviation crashes (N = 169) were analyzed using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) to elucidate the role of error in Australian crashes. Aircrew were more likely to commit skill-based and decision errors in the presence of substandard personal readiness, physical and mental limitations, and adverse mental states. Violations were associated with the presence of crew resource management failures. Reconfiguring the assessment of crashes by aviation insurers will further support analyses consistent with the systems approaches to accident investigation and comparison with other accident data sources.

Key concepts: Aeronautics, Aviation, Aviation accident, Engineering, Aviation safety, Transport engineering, Poison control, General aviation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Analysis of General Aviation Crashes in Australia Using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System — Research Paper | ScholarLens