2008•Pakistan Journal of Biological SciencesRequires access

Preemptive Analgesia with Local Lidocaine Infiltration for Single-Level Open Disc Operation

Esmail Fakharian, Fazel Mohammad-R, Tabesh Homayoon

Open publisher page 10 citations

Abstract

To evaluate the impact of preemptive local analgesia at the incision site for postoperative pain in patients undergoing disc operation. In this prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study 166 patients were assigned to either lidocaine (n = 83) or placebo (n = 83) groups. The incision site was infiltrated with either 20 mL of 2% lidocaine and 0.9% saline in lidocaine group or 0.9% saline before the incision. Morphine (5 mg) was used for postoperative pain treatment. Postoperative pain was measured with Visual Analog Scale (VAS) in 6, 12, 24 and 48 h. Data were analyzed with SPSS software, using Chi-square and t-tests. The groups were matched for age, sex, type of operation, mean length of hospital stay and mean length of operation. Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference in visual analog scores of pain severity at 6, 12, 24 and 48 h after surgery between lidocaine and placebo groups (6 h: 38.22 +/- 26.87 vs. 34.52 +/- 24.43, p = 0.35; 12 h: 33.26 +/- 28.83 vs. 28.01 +/- 24.71, p = 0.20; 24 h: 26.71 +/- 23.31 vs. 22.85 +/- 22.48, p = 0.27; 48 h 16.35 +/- 10.16 vs. 15.23 +/- 8.90 p = 0.45). The amount of narcotics used post operatively had no meaningful difference in the groups (lidocaine 10.07 +/- 8.24 mg vs. placebo 10.54 +/- 9.31 mg p = 0.73). Preemptive analgesia with lidocaine 2% used subcutaneously before skin incision has no effect in reducing postoperative pain, narcotics demand and duration of hospital stay.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

To evaluate the impact of preemptive local analgesia at the incision site for postoperative pain in patients undergoing disc operation. In this prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study 166 patients were assigned to either lidocaine (n = 83) or placebo (n = 83) groups. The incision site was infiltrated with either 20 mL of 2% lidocaine and 0.9% saline in lidocaine group or 0.9% saline before the incision. Morphine (5 mg) was used for postoperative pain treatment. Postoperative pain was measured with Visual Analog Scale (VAS) in 6, 12, 24 and 48 h. Data were analyzed with SPSS software, using Chi-square and t-tests. The groups were matched for age, sex, type of operation, mean length of hospital stay and mean length of operation. Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference in visual analog scores of pain severity at 6, 12, 24 and 48 h after surgery between lidocaine and placebo groups (6 h: 38.22 +/- 26.87 vs. 34.52 +/- 24.43, p = 0.35; 12 h: 33.26 +/- 28.83 vs. 28.01 +/- 24.71, p = 0.20; 24 h: 26.71 +/- 23.31 vs. 22.85 +/- 22.48, p = 0.27; 48 h 16.35 +/- 10.16 vs. 15.23 +/- 8.90 p = 0.45). The amount of narcotics used post operatively had no meaningful difference in the groups (lidocaine 10.07 +/- 8.24 mg vs. placebo 10.54 +/- 9.31 mg p = 0.73). Preemptive analgesia with lidocaine 2% used subcutaneously before skin incision has no effect in reducing postoperative pain, narcotics demand and duration of hospital stay.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

To evaluate the impact of preemptive local analgesia at the incision site for postoperative pain in patients undergoing disc operation. In this prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study 166 patients were assigned to either lidocaine (n = 83) or placebo (n = 83) groups. The incision site was infiltrated with either 20 mL of 2% lidocaine and 0.9% saline in lidocaine group or 0.9% saline before the incision. Morphine (5 mg) was used for postoperative pain treatment. Postoperative pain was measured with Visual Analog Scale (VAS) in 6, 12, 24 and 48 h. Data were analyzed with SPSS software, using Chi-square and t-tests. The groups were matched for age, sex, type of operation, mean length of hospital stay and mean length of operation. Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference in visual analog scores of pain severity at 6, 12, 24 and 48 h after surgery between lidocaine and placebo groups (6 h: 38.22 +/- 26.87 vs. 34.52 +/- 24.43, p = 0.35; 12 h: 33.26 +/- 28.83 vs. 28.01 +/- 24.71, p = 0.20; 24 h: 26.71 +/- 23.31 vs. 22.85 +/- 22.48, p = 0.27; 48 h 16.35 +/- 10.16 vs. 15.23 +/- 8.90 p = 0.45). The amount of narcotics used post operatively had no meaningful difference in the groups (lidocaine 10.07 +/- 8.24 mg vs. placebo 10.54 +/- 9.31 mg p = 0.73). Preemptive analgesia with lidocaine 2% used subcutaneously before skin incision has no effect in reducing postoperative pain, narcotics demand and duration of hospital stay.

Key concepts: Lidocaine, Medicine, Anesthesia, Visual analogue scale, Placebo, Saline, Surgery, Morphine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Preemptive Analgesia with Local Lidocaine Infiltration for Single-Level Open Disc Operation — Research Paper | ScholarLens