1991The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaOpen access

Determination of traffic noise barrier effectiveness.

Lloyd A. Herman, William Bowlby, Thomas O’Grady, Cong Chen

Open full text 4 citations

Abstract

This study evaluated the benefits of a noise control program involving construction of over $13 million of traffic noise barriers along Interstate 440 in Nashville, TN. In addition, much of I-440 was depressed in a rock cut with an objective of reducing the traffic noise levels. There were four basic objectives to the study: (1) determine barrier insertion losses at various sites for various geometric configurations; (2) determine change in community noise levels (from before the highway project); (3) study effectiveness of sound-absorbing blocks used on one section to minimize multiple reflections between parallel barriers; and (4) investigate reasons for any differences between predicted and measured insertion losses. Measurements of A-weighted average sound levels and noise reduction were made at over 40 sites. Calibrated predictions of levels without the barriers were also made. Differences in design geometries, terrain, and construction techniques made it impossible to generalize results from one measurement area to the next. The study also afforded the opportunity for a major application and evaluation of the indirect measured and indirect predicted methods in ANSI S12.8-1987, ‘‘American National Standard Methods for Determination of Insertion Loss of Outdoor Noise Barriers.’’

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study evaluated the benefits of a noise control program involving construction of over $13 million of traffic noise barriers along Interstate 440 in Nashville, TN. In addition, much of I-440 was depressed in a rock cut with an objective of reducing the traffic noise levels. There were four basic objectives to the study: (1) determine barrier insertion losses at various sites for various geometric configurations; (2) determine change in community noise levels (from before the highway project); (3) study effectiveness of sound-absorbing blocks used on one section to minimize multiple reflections between parallel barriers; and (4) investigate reasons for any differences between predicted and measured insertion losses. Measurements of A-weighted average sound levels and noise reduction were made at over 40 sites. Calibrated predictions of levels without the barriers were also made. Differences in design geometries, terrain, and construction techniques made it impossible to generalize results from one measurement area to the next. The study also afforded the opportunity for a major application and evaluation of the indirect measured and indirect predicted methods in ANSI S12.8-1987, ‘‘American National Standard Methods for Determination of Insertion Loss of Outdoor Noise Barriers.’’

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study evaluated the benefits of a noise control program involving construction of over $13 million of traffic noise barriers along Interstate 440 in Nashville, TN. In addition, much of I-440 was depressed in a rock cut with an objective of reducing the traffic noise levels. There were four basic objectives to the study: (1) determine barrier insertion losses at various sites for various geometric configurations; (2) determine change in community noise levels (from before the highway project); (3) study effectiveness of sound-absorbing blocks used on one section to minimize multiple reflections between parallel barriers; and (4) investigate reasons for any differences between predicted and measured insertion losses. Measurements of A-weighted average sound levels and noise reduction were made at over 40 sites. Calibrated predictions of levels without the barriers were also made. Differences in design geometries, terrain, and construction techniques made it impossible to generalize results from one measurement area to the next. The study also afforded the opportunity for a major application and evaluation of the indirect measured and indirect predicted methods in ANSI S12.8-1987, ‘‘American National Standard Methods for Determination of Insertion Loss of Outdoor Noise Barriers.’’

Key concepts: Noise barrier, Noise (video), Roadway noise, Traffic noise, Terrain, Noise control, Noise reduction, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Determination of traffic noise barrier effectiveness. — Research Paper | ScholarLens