2003Issues in Legal ScholarshipRequires access

The Public Trust and In-stream Uses

Jan Stevens

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The public trust doctrine, an ancient but newly revived common law remedy, can prevent the continued destruction of public waters. This Article takes an historical overview of the doctrine as it applies to nonnavigable waters, focusing on the California cases involving Mono Lake, the Lower American River, and Putah Creek. The author concludes that public trust considerations were intertwined with the appropriative water rights system long before the 1983 Mono Lake decision. Furthermore, the public trust doctrine will continue to impact future water decisions in California, with potentially significant impacts on California’s Colorado River water supply.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The public trust doctrine, an ancient but newly revived common law remedy, can prevent the continued destruction of public waters. This Article takes an historical overview of the doctrine as it applies to nonnavigable waters, focusing on the California cases involving Mono Lake, the Lower American River, and Putah Creek. The author concludes that public trust considerations were intertwined with the appropriative water rights system long before the 1983 Mono Lake decision. Furthermore, the public trust doctrine will continue to impact future water decisions in California, with potentially significant impacts on California’s Colorado River water supply.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The public trust doctrine, an ancient but newly revived common law remedy, can prevent the continued destruction of public waters. This Article takes an historical overview of the doctrine as it applies to nonnavigable waters, focusing on the California cases involving Mono Lake, the Lower American River, and Putah Creek. The author concludes that public trust considerations were intertwined with the appropriative water rights system long before the 1983 Mono Lake decision. Furthermore, the public trust doctrine will continue to impact future water decisions in California, with potentially significant impacts on California’s Colorado River water supply.

Key concepts: Public trust doctrine, Doctrine, Public trust, Law, Water supply, Water right, Political science, Environmental planning

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Public Trust and In-stream Uses — Research Paper | ScholarLens