The Public Trust and In-stream Uses
Jan Stevens
Abstract
Jan Stevens
Abstract
The public trust doctrine, an ancient but newly revived common law remedy, can prevent the continued destruction of public waters. This Article takes an historical overview of the doctrine as it applies to nonnavigable waters, focusing on the California cases involving Mono Lake, the Lower American River, and Putah Creek. The author concludes that public trust considerations were intertwined with the appropriative water rights system long before the 1983 Mono Lake decision. Furthermore, the public trust doctrine will continue to impact future water decisions in California, with potentially significant impacts on California’s Colorado River water supply.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The public trust doctrine, an ancient but newly revived common law remedy, can prevent the continued destruction of public waters. This Article takes an historical overview of the doctrine as it applies to nonnavigable waters, focusing on the California cases involving Mono Lake, the Lower American River, and Putah Creek. The author concludes that public trust considerations were intertwined with the appropriative water rights system long before the 1983 Mono Lake decision. Furthermore, the public trust doctrine will continue to impact future water decisions in California, with potentially significant impacts on California’s Colorado River water supply.
Key concepts: Public trust doctrine, Doctrine, Public trust, Law, Water supply, Water right, Political science, Environmental planning