1992SpineRequires access

Iliac Crest Versus Spinous Process Grafts in Posttraumatic Spinal Fusions

James S. Keene, Nancy E. McKinley

Open publisher page 30 citations

Abstract

Results of posttraumatic spine fusions in 34 patients who had autogenous iliac crest grafts were compared with those of 70 patients who had autogenous spinous process grafts. The two groups of patients were otherwise homogenous, and fusion occurred in 32 (94%) of the iliac crest graft patients and 70 (100%) spinous process graft patients. However, average operative time (225 vs. 200 minutes) and operative blood loss (1371 vs. 1136 cc) were significantly higher in iliac crest graft patients (P less than 0.05), and five iliac crest graft patients had significant donor site complications. Use of spinous process grafts eliminated donor site problems, reduced operative time and blood loss, and produced a rate of arthrodesis equal to that of iliac crest grafts.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Results of posttraumatic spine fusions in 34 patients who had autogenous iliac crest grafts were compared with those of 70 patients who had autogenous spinous process grafts. The two groups of patients were otherwise homogenous, and fusion occurred in 32 (94%) of the iliac crest graft patients and 70 (100%) spinous process graft patients. However, average operative time (225 vs. 200 minutes) and operative blood loss (1371 vs. 1136 cc) were significantly higher in iliac crest graft patients (P less than 0.05), and five iliac crest graft patients had significant donor site complications. Use of spinous process grafts eliminated donor site problems, reduced operative time and blood loss, and produced a rate of arthrodesis equal to that of iliac crest grafts.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 30 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Results of posttraumatic spine fusions in 34 patients who had autogenous iliac crest grafts were compared with those of 70 patients who had autogenous spinous process grafts. The two groups of patients were otherwise homogenous, and fusion occurred in 32 (94%) of the iliac crest graft patients and 70 (100%) spinous process graft patients. However, average operative time (225 vs. 200 minutes) and operative blood loss (1371 vs. 1136 cc) were significantly higher in iliac crest graft patients (P less than 0.05), and five iliac crest graft patients had significant donor site complications. Use of spinous process grafts eliminated donor site problems, reduced operative time and blood loss, and produced a rate of arthrodesis equal to that of iliac crest grafts.

Key concepts: Medicine, Iliac crest, Spinous process, Anatomy, Process (computing), Spinal fusion, Surgery, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Iliac Crest Versus Spinous Process Grafts in Posttraumatic Spinal Fusions — Research Paper | ScholarLens