A Conceptualization and Test of the Influences of Individual Differences in Goal‐Setting Situations1
Lynn Kalnbach, Verlin B. Hinsz
Abstract
Lynn Kalnbach, Verlin B. Hinsz
Abstract
This research tests a hypothesized model of the relationships among several individual differences and variables associated with the setting of goals. Participants were randomly assigned to a self‐set goal condition, or to moderately or very‐difficult assigned‐goal conditions. By aggregating scores of performance, personal goals, ratings of self‐efficacy, and goal commitment over multiple goal‐setting and task‐performance occasions, the overall relationships among these variables and need for achievement, self‐esteem, and locus of control were determined. Results provide strong support for Locke and Latham's (1990a, 1990b) model of the goal‐performance relation, but fail to support the hypothesized role of individual differences. The implications of these findings and individual differences in goal‐setting situations are discussed.
OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This research tests a hypothesized model of the relationships among several individual differences and variables associated with the setting of goals. Participants were randomly assigned to a self‐set goal condition, or to moderately or very‐difficult assigned‐goal conditions. By aggregating scores of performance, personal goals, ratings of self‐efficacy, and goal commitment over multiple goal‐setting and task‐performance occasions, the overall relationships among these variables and need for achievement, self‐esteem, and locus of control were determined. Results provide strong support for Locke and Latham's (1990a, 1990b) model of the goal‐performance relation, but fail to support the hypothesized role of individual differences. The implications of these findings and individual differences in goal‐setting situations are discussed.
Key concepts: Psychology, Conceptualization, Locus of control, Social psychology, Goal setting, Task (project management), Set (abstract data type), Test (biology)