2012Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Water ManagementRequires access

Flood routing in branched river by genetic programming

Hossein Orouji, Omid Bozorg‐Haddad, Elahe Fallah-Mehdipour, Miguel A. Mariño

Open publisher page 40 citations

Abstract

Flood routing in branched rivers is an important issue in river engineering. Hydraulic approaches to address the issue involve complex equations that are applied in flood routing with high accuracy but using a lot of data, especially river specifications. In contrast, hydrologic flood routing approaches are simple and employ limited parameters coupled with linear and nonlinear equations based on the continuity equation to route the flood. In the present study, to achieve a routed flood hydrograph considering both accuracy and simplification in the routing process, two hydrologic methods, based on (1) an extended version of the Muskingum method and (2) genetic programming (GP), were applied in a branched river in Iran for 10- and 100-year flood return periods and the results compared with those of the St. Venant equations as a numerical hydraulic method. The results show that GP decreased (improved) the sum of the squared deviation (SSQ) between hydraulic and hydrologic routed outflows by 90·71 and 49·24% compared to the extended Muskingum method for 10- and 100-year flood return periods, respectively, although GP used less input data than the St. Venant equations. There was no considerable difference between GP and St. Venant routed hydrographs. In addition, the GP approach is simple but its application is not restricted to single-reach problems. The present results indicate that the proposed hydrologic method, based on GP, is effective in routing flood hydrographs in branched rivers.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Flood routing in branched rivers is an important issue in river engineering. Hydraulic approaches to address the issue involve complex equations that are applied in flood routing with high accuracy but using a lot of data, especially river specifications. In contrast, hydrologic flood routing approaches are simple and employ limited parameters coupled with linear and nonlinear equations based on the continuity equation to route the flood. In the present study, to achieve a routed flood hydrograph considering both accuracy and simplification in the routing process, two hydrologic methods, based on (1) an extended version of the Muskingum method and (2) genetic programming (GP), were applied in a branched river in Iran for 10- and 100-year flood return periods and the results compared with those of the St. Venant equations as a numerical hydraulic method. The results show that GP decreased (improved) the sum of the squared deviation (SSQ) between hydraulic and hydrologic routed outflows by 90·71 and 49·24% compared to the extended Muskingum method for 10- and 100-year flood return periods, respectively, although GP used less input data than the St. Venant equations. There was no considerable difference between GP and St. Venant routed hydrographs. In addition, the GP approach is simple but its application is not restricted to single-reach problems. The present results indicate that the proposed hydrologic method, based on GP, is effective in routing flood hydrographs in branched rivers.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 40 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Flood routing in branched rivers is an important issue in river engineering. Hydraulic approaches to address the issue involve complex equations that are applied in flood routing with high accuracy but using a lot of data, especially river specifications. In contrast, hydrologic flood routing approaches are simple and employ limited parameters coupled with linear and nonlinear equations based on the continuity equation to route the flood. In the present study, to achieve a routed flood hydrograph considering both accuracy and simplification in the routing process, two hydrologic methods, based on (1) an extended version of the Muskingum method and (2) genetic programming (GP), were applied in a branched river in Iran for 10- and 100-year flood return periods and the results compared with those of the St. Venant equations as a numerical hydraulic method. The results show that GP decreased (improved) the sum of the squared deviation (SSQ) between hydraulic and hydrologic routed outflows by 90·71 and 49·24% compared to the extended Muskingum method for 10- and 100-year flood return periods, respectively, although GP used less input data than the St. Venant equations. There was no considerable difference between GP and St. Venant routed hydrographs. In addition, the GP approach is simple but its application is not restricted to single-reach problems. The present results indicate that the proposed hydrologic method, based on GP, is effective in routing flood hydrographs in branched rivers.

Key concepts: Hydrograph, Routing (electronic design automation), Flood myth, Hydrology (agriculture), Genetic programming, Computer science, Hydrological modelling, Mathematical optimization

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Flood routing in branched river by genetic programming — Research Paper | ScholarLens