1988•The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical CareRequires access

Selective Conservatism in Abdominal Stab Wounds

Robert Zubowski, Manohar N. Nallathambi, Rao R. Ivatury, Wilhelm Stahl

Open publisher page 33 citations

Abstract

An analysis of 186 consecutive patients with anterior abdominal stab wounds in a 2-year period was carried out to assess the efficacy of serial physical examination as the determining factor for the need for laparotomy. Of 106 patients managed by clinical evaluation, the incidence of negative laparotomy was 0.9% and three patients (2.7%) had an "unnecessary" celiotomy. There were no missed injuries or delayed detection of intraperitoneal visceral trauma. The incidence of negative laparotomy among patients subjected to wound exploration +/- peritoneal lavage (n = 41) was 2.4%, and 39 patients had mandatory laparotomy for evisceration, with a negative celiotomy rate of 20.5%. Our experience supports serial physical examination as a highly effective method of "selective conservatism" of anterior abdominal stab wounds. Mandatory laparotomy for evisceration needs further clarification.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

An analysis of 186 consecutive patients with anterior abdominal stab wounds in a 2-year period was carried out to assess the efficacy of serial physical examination as the determining factor for the need for laparotomy. Of 106 patients managed by clinical evaluation, the incidence of negative laparotomy was 0.9% and three patients (2.7%) had an "unnecessary" celiotomy. There were no missed injuries or delayed detection of intraperitoneal visceral trauma. The incidence of negative laparotomy among patients subjected to wound exploration +/- peritoneal lavage (n = 41) was 2.4%, and 39 patients had mandatory laparotomy for evisceration, with a negative celiotomy rate of 20.5%. Our experience supports serial physical examination as a highly effective method of "selective conservatism" of anterior abdominal stab wounds. Mandatory laparotomy for evisceration needs further clarification.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 33 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

An analysis of 186 consecutive patients with anterior abdominal stab wounds in a 2-year period was carried out to assess the efficacy of serial physical examination as the determining factor for the need for laparotomy. Of 106 patients managed by clinical evaluation, the incidence of negative laparotomy was 0.9% and three patients (2.7%) had an "unnecessary" celiotomy. There were no missed injuries or delayed detection of intraperitoneal visceral trauma. The incidence of negative laparotomy among patients subjected to wound exploration +/- peritoneal lavage (n = 41) was 2.4%, and 39 patients had mandatory laparotomy for evisceration, with a negative celiotomy rate of 20.5%. Our experience supports serial physical examination as a highly effective method of "selective conservatism" of anterior abdominal stab wounds. Mandatory laparotomy for evisceration needs further clarification.

Key concepts: Evisceration (ophthalmology), Laparotomy, Medicine, Stab, Stab wound, Surgery, Physical examination, Incidence (geometry)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Selective Conservatism in Abdominal Stab Wounds — Research Paper | ScholarLens