2009•Plastic & Reconstructive SurgeryRequires access

Gridplan Midfacial Analysis for Alloplastic Implants at the Time of Jaw Surgery

Pier Francesco Nocini, Armando Boccieri, Dario Bertossi

Open publisher page 31 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Middle-third facial implants are primarily indicated for facial plastic surgery and orthognathic surgery as well as the secondary treatment of facial trauma and congenital malformations. Several methods of clinical analysis have been described both for defect classification and for surgical technique and implant materials. These prove very difficult to apply so as to establish a precise standard. METHODS: A new frontal-view facial analysis was developed on the basis of a grid of three vertical and five horizontal lines, divided in turn into six high and four lower middle-third areas with three vertical lines on side view. These vertical lines (LC and P) prove useful for the purposes of quantifying degree of defect. The lines can be marked on the patient's face during the intraoperative phase so as to ensure correct implant placement. Medpor implants were applied and secured by means of circumvestibular incision during Le Fort I osteotomy with titanium miniscrews. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-one patients with zygomatic defects were treated by means of this method during the correction of facial malocclusion. The results were achieved as planned during the preoperative phase in all cases. Postoperative complications were of minor severity, and only one implant was removed. CONCLUSIONS: This method of facial analysis is simple, and the drawing of lines proves useful to ensure correct implant positioning and symmetry during the surgical phase. In addition to being very easy to apply, position, and shape, Medpor implants also offer long-term stability and involve no any major complications.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Middle-third facial implants are primarily indicated for facial plastic surgery and orthognathic surgery as well as the secondary treatment of facial trauma and congenital malformations. Several methods of clinical analysis have been described both for defect classification and for surgical technique and implant materials. These prove very difficult to apply so as to establish a precise standard. METHODS: A new frontal-view facial analysis was developed on the basis of a grid of three vertical and five horizontal lines, divided in turn into six high and four lower middle-third areas with three vertical lines on side view. These vertical lines (LC and P) prove useful for the purposes of quantifying degree of defect. The lines can be marked on the patient's face during the intraoperative phase so as to ensure correct implant placement. Medpor implants were applied and secured by means of circumvestibular incision during Le Fort I osteotomy with titanium miniscrews. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-one patients with zygomatic defects were treated by means of this method during the correction of facial malocclusion. The results were achieved as planned during the preoperative phase in all cases. Postoperative complications were of minor severity, and only one implant was removed. CONCLUSIONS: This method of facial analysis is simple, and the drawing of lines proves useful to ensure correct implant positioning and symmetry during the surgical phase. In addition to being very easy to apply, position, and shape, Medpor implants also offer long-term stability and involve no any major complications.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 31 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Middle-third facial implants are primarily indicated for facial plastic surgery and orthognathic surgery as well as the secondary treatment of facial trauma and congenital malformations. Several methods of clinical analysis have been described both for defect classification and for surgical technique and implant materials. These prove very difficult to apply so as to establish a precise standard. METHODS: A new frontal-view facial analysis was developed on the basis of a grid of three vertical and five horizontal lines, divided in turn into six high and four lower middle-third areas with three vertical lines on side view. These vertical lines (LC and P) prove useful for the purposes of quantifying degree of defect. The lines can be marked on the patient's face during the intraoperative phase so as to ensure correct implant placement. Medpor implants were applied and secured by means of circumvestibular incision during Le Fort I osteotomy with titanium miniscrews. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-one patients with zygomatic defects were treated by means of this method during the correction of facial malocclusion. The results were achieved as planned during the preoperative phase in all cases. Postoperative complications were of minor severity, and only one implant was removed. CONCLUSIONS: This method of facial analysis is simple, and the drawing of lines proves useful to ensure correct implant positioning and symmetry during the surgical phase. In addition to being very easy to apply, position, and shape, Medpor implants also offer long-term stability and involve no any major complications.

Key concepts: Implant, Medicine, Facial symmetry, Osteotomy, Orthognathic surgery, Orthodontics, Dentistry, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Gridplan Midfacial Analysis for Alloplastic Implants at the Time of Jaw Surgery — Research Paper | ScholarLens