2012Transnational Legal TheoryRequires access

The Emergence of Global Administrative Law and Transnational Regulation

Karl‐Heinz Ladeur

Open publisher page 32 citations

Abstract

Discussion of the emergence of global administrative law is centred around the question ‘Is it law?' and problems of accountability. This is a narrow perspective which ignores the autonomy of administrative ‘internal law’ generated by administrative agencies themselves. The extent to which domestic administrative law is a product of courts or legislators is much less significant than has hitherto been taken for granted. For global administrative law the entanglement of administrative practice and normativity is crucial. The creation of administrative law through an experimental network of decisions and public-private cooperation, and as a consequence its ongoing self-transformation, should be considered a necessity. This is why it should not come as a surprise that the instruments and forms of global administrative law are generated by transnational administrative networks of agencies. The evolution of both domestic and transnational administrative law will allow for new heterarchical forms of accountability and legitimation once the focus on a hierarchical concept of delegation is given up. For both domestic and global administrative law the adoption of new approaches to ex post monitoring of administrative action and learning seems to be more promising than the traditional focus on the binding force of legal rules ex ante.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Discussion of the emergence of global administrative law is centred around the question ‘Is it law?' and problems of accountability. This is a narrow perspective which ignores the autonomy of administrative ‘internal law’ generated by administrative agencies themselves. The extent to which domestic administrative law is a product of courts or legislators is much less significant than has hitherto been taken for granted. For global administrative law the entanglement of administrative practice and normativity is crucial. The creation of administrative law through an experimental network of decisions and public-private cooperation, and as a consequence its ongoing self-transformation, should be considered a necessity. This is why it should not come as a surprise that the instruments and forms of global administrative law are generated by transnational administrative networks of agencies. The evolution of both domestic and transnational administrative law will allow for new heterarchical forms of accountability and legitimation once the focus on a hierarchical concept of delegation is given up. For both domestic and global administrative law the adoption of new approaches to ex post monitoring of administrative action and learning seems to be more promising than the traditional focus on the binding force of legal rules ex ante.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 32 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Discussion of the emergence of global administrative law is centred around the question ‘Is it law?' and problems of accountability. This is a narrow perspective which ignores the autonomy of administrative ‘internal law’ generated by administrative agencies themselves. The extent to which domestic administrative law is a product of courts or legislators is much less significant than has hitherto been taken for granted. For global administrative law the entanglement of administrative practice and normativity is crucial. The creation of administrative law through an experimental network of decisions and public-private cooperation, and as a consequence its ongoing self-transformation, should be considered a necessity. This is why it should not come as a surprise that the instruments and forms of global administrative law are generated by transnational administrative networks of agencies. The evolution of both domestic and transnational administrative law will allow for new heterarchical forms of accountability and legitimation once the focus on a hierarchical concept of delegation is given up. For both domestic and global administrative law the adoption of new approaches to ex post monitoring of administrative action and learning seems to be more promising than the traditional focus on the binding force of legal rules ex ante.

Key concepts: Administrative law, Public law, Accountability, Delegation, Private law, Political science, Law, Comparative law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Emergence of Global Administrative Law and Transnational Regulation — Research Paper | ScholarLens