1996Water Resources ResearchRequires access

Implications of Spatial Variability of Soil Physical Properties for Simulation of Evaporation at the Field Scale

Elisabet Lewan, Per‐Erik Jansson

Open publisher page 14 citations

Abstract

Soil water retention curves in eight soil profiles on a sandy soil were determined by field measurements of soil water content and soil water matric potential made during 19 days of continuous drying using time‐domain‐reflectometry and tensiometers. Evaporation from the different profiles was simulated using the retention curves and estimated unsaturated conductivity functions, meteorological data as driving variables, and measured soil water matric potentials at 40 cm depths as the lower boundary condition. Good agreement was obtained between simulated and measured evaporation from different locations in the field. Areal mean evaporation obtained as the arithmetic mean of individual simulations was 2% smaller than the evaporation obtained using mean physical properties in one simulation. This difference was small compared to the variation in simulated evaporation between individual locations (62–142% of the meanevaporation).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Soil water retention curves in eight soil profiles on a sandy soil were determined by field measurements of soil water content and soil water matric potential made during 19 days of continuous drying using time‐domain‐reflectometry and tensiometers. Evaporation from the different profiles was simulated using the retention curves and estimated unsaturated conductivity functions, meteorological data as driving variables, and measured soil water matric potentials at 40 cm depths as the lower boundary condition. Good agreement was obtained between simulated and measured evaporation from different locations in the field. Areal mean evaporation obtained as the arithmetic mean of individual simulations was 2% smaller than the evaporation obtained using mean physical properties in one simulation. This difference was small compared to the variation in simulated evaporation between individual locations (62–142% of the meanevaporation).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Soil water retention curves in eight soil profiles on a sandy soil were determined by field measurements of soil water content and soil water matric potential made during 19 days of continuous drying using time‐domain‐reflectometry and tensiometers. Evaporation from the different profiles was simulated using the retention curves and estimated unsaturated conductivity functions, meteorological data as driving variables, and measured soil water matric potentials at 40 cm depths as the lower boundary condition. Good agreement was obtained between simulated and measured evaporation from different locations in the field. Areal mean evaporation obtained as the arithmetic mean of individual simulations was 2% smaller than the evaporation obtained using mean physical properties in one simulation. This difference was small compared to the variation in simulated evaporation between individual locations (62–142% of the meanevaporation).

Key concepts: Evaporation, Soil science, Reflectometry, Soil water, Environmental science, Spatial variability, Water content, Hydraulic conductivity

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Implications of Spatial Variability of Soil Physical Properties for Simulation of Evaporation at the Field Scale — Research Paper | ScholarLens