Implications of Spatial Variability of Soil Physical Properties for Simulation of Evaporation at the Field Scale
Elisabet Lewan, Per‐Erik Jansson
Abstract
Elisabet Lewan, Per‐Erik Jansson
Abstract
Soil water retention curves in eight soil profiles on a sandy soil were determined by field measurements of soil water content and soil water matric potential made during 19 days of continuous drying using time‐domain‐reflectometry and tensiometers. Evaporation from the different profiles was simulated using the retention curves and estimated unsaturated conductivity functions, meteorological data as driving variables, and measured soil water matric potentials at 40 cm depths as the lower boundary condition. Good agreement was obtained between simulated and measured evaporation from different locations in the field. Areal mean evaporation obtained as the arithmetic mean of individual simulations was 2% smaller than the evaporation obtained using mean physical properties in one simulation. This difference was small compared to the variation in simulated evaporation between individual locations (62–142% of the meanevaporation).
OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Soil water retention curves in eight soil profiles on a sandy soil were determined by field measurements of soil water content and soil water matric potential made during 19 days of continuous drying using time‐domain‐reflectometry and tensiometers. Evaporation from the different profiles was simulated using the retention curves and estimated unsaturated conductivity functions, meteorological data as driving variables, and measured soil water matric potentials at 40 cm depths as the lower boundary condition. Good agreement was obtained between simulated and measured evaporation from different locations in the field. Areal mean evaporation obtained as the arithmetic mean of individual simulations was 2% smaller than the evaporation obtained using mean physical properties in one simulation. This difference was small compared to the variation in simulated evaporation between individual locations (62–142% of the meanevaporation).
Key concepts: Evaporation, Soil science, Reflectometry, Soil water, Environmental science, Spatial variability, Water content, Hydraulic conductivity