1993British Journal of Clinical PsychologyRequires access

Utility of the Modified Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in neuropsychological assessment

M. D. van den Broek, C. M. Bradshaw, E. Szabadi

Open publisher page 89 citations

Abstract

Nelson's (1976) Modified Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (MCST) was evaluated and the utility of the conventional criterion and new threshold scores for identifying patients with frontal lobe disorder assessed. Measures of perseveration and other indices of performance on the MCST were not found to discriminate between patients with frontal and non-frontal lobe lesions, using either the conventional criterion or new threshold scores. In addition there were no significant differences between left- and right-sided lesioned patients. However, the task was found to have high specificity (98.7 per cent) and good sensitivity (45.6 per cent) to lesions irrespective of site indicating that it may be a useful screening test. The present findings are consistent with recent research with the original Wisconsin Test, that suggests that card-sorting performance may not be as differentially sensitive to frontal lobe disorder as has been thought hitherto.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Nelson's (1976) Modified Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (MCST) was evaluated and the utility of the conventional criterion and new threshold scores for identifying patients with frontal lobe disorder assessed. Measures of perseveration and other indices of performance on the MCST were not found to discriminate between patients with frontal and non-frontal lobe lesions, using either the conventional criterion or new threshold scores. In addition there were no significant differences between left- and right-sided lesioned patients. However, the task was found to have high specificity (98.7 per cent) and good sensitivity (45.6 per cent) to lesions irrespective of site indicating that it may be a useful screening test. The present findings are consistent with recent research with the original Wisconsin Test, that suggests that card-sorting performance may not be as differentially sensitive to frontal lobe disorder as has been thought hitherto.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 89 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Nelson's (1976) Modified Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (MCST) was evaluated and the utility of the conventional criterion and new threshold scores for identifying patients with frontal lobe disorder assessed. Measures of perseveration and other indices of performance on the MCST were not found to discriminate between patients with frontal and non-frontal lobe lesions, using either the conventional criterion or new threshold scores. In addition there were no significant differences between left- and right-sided lesioned patients. However, the task was found to have high specificity (98.7 per cent) and good sensitivity (45.6 per cent) to lesions irrespective of site indicating that it may be a useful screening test. The present findings are consistent with recent research with the original Wisconsin Test, that suggests that card-sorting performance may not be as differentially sensitive to frontal lobe disorder as has been thought hitherto.

Key concepts: Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, Perseveration, Frontal lobe, Psychology, Card sorting, Neuropsychological test, Neuropsychology, Audiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Utility of the Modified Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in neuropsychological assessment — Research Paper | ScholarLens