2009•Journal of Rehabilitation MedicineOpen access

Efficacy of neck stabilization exercises for neck pain: A randomized controlled study

Y Dusunceli, Cihat Öztürk, Funda Calis Atamaz, Simin Hepgüler, Berrin Durmaz

Open full text 134 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of neck stabilization exercises in the management of neck pain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty patients with neck pain were randomized to 3 groups, as follows: group 1--physical therapy agents including transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, continuous ultrasound and infra-red irradiation; group 2--physical therapy agents + isometric and stretching exercises; and group 3--physical therapy agents + neck stabilization exercises. The exercises were performed as a home training programme following a 3-week supervised group exercise. The patients were evaluated with a visual analogue scale, by intake of paracetamol, Neck Disability Index, Beck Depression Scale and range of motion in the 3 planes at baseline and at months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12. RESULTS: Compared with baseline, all groups showed a significant decrease in visual analogue scale scores during the first 6 months. However, this improvement was maintained only in group 3 at 9 and 12 months, with a significant difference among the groups (p<0.05). During the study, the improvement in disability was marked in group 3 with respect to Neck Disability Index, Beck Depression Scale and range of motion in the frontal plane (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the superiority of the neck stabilization exercises, with some advantages in the pain and disability outcomes, compared with isometric and stretching exercises in combination with physical therapy agents for the management of neck pain.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of neck stabilization exercises in the management of neck pain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty patients with neck pain were randomized to 3 groups, as follows: group 1--physical therapy agents including transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, continuous ultrasound and infra-red irradiation; group 2--physical therapy agents + isometric and stretching exercises; and group 3--physical therapy agents + neck stabilization exercises. The exercises were performed as a home training programme following a 3-week supervised group exercise. The patients were evaluated with a visual analogue scale, by intake of paracetamol, Neck Disability Index, Beck Depression Scale and range of motion in the 3 planes at baseline and at months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12. RESULTS: Compared with baseline, all groups showed a significant decrease in visual analogue scale scores during the first 6 months. However, this improvement was maintained only in group 3 at 9 and 12 months, with a significant difference among the groups (p<0.05). During the study, the improvement in disability was marked in group 3 with respect to Neck Disability Index, Beck Depression Scale and range of motion in the frontal plane (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the superiority of the neck stabilization exercises, with some advantages in the pain and disability outcomes, compared with isometric and stretching exercises in combination with physical therapy agents for the management of neck pain.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 134 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of neck stabilization exercises in the management of neck pain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty patients with neck pain were randomized to 3 groups, as follows: group 1--physical therapy agents including transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, continuous ultrasound and infra-red irradiation; group 2--physical therapy agents + isometric and stretching exercises; and group 3--physical therapy agents + neck stabilization exercises. The exercises were performed as a home training programme following a 3-week supervised group exercise. The patients were evaluated with a visual analogue scale, by intake of paracetamol, Neck Disability Index, Beck Depression Scale and range of motion in the 3 planes at baseline and at months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12. RESULTS: Compared with baseline, all groups showed a significant decrease in visual analogue scale scores during the first 6 months. However, this improvement was maintained only in group 3 at 9 and 12 months, with a significant difference among the groups (p<0.05). During the study, the improvement in disability was marked in group 3 with respect to Neck Disability Index, Beck Depression Scale and range of motion in the frontal plane (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the superiority of the neck stabilization exercises, with some advantages in the pain and disability outcomes, compared with isometric and stretching exercises in combination with physical therapy agents for the management of neck pain.

Key concepts: Medicine, Visual analogue scale, Neck pain, Physical therapy, Isometric exercise, Randomized controlled trial, Range of motion, Beck Depression Inventory

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Efficacy of neck stabilization exercises for neck pain: A randomized controlled study — Research Paper | ScholarLens