1992Annals of Internal MedicineRequires access

Results of Bone Densitometry Affect Women's Decisions about Taking Measures To Prevent Fractures

Susan M. Rubin, Steven R. Cummings

Open publisher page 185 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe how the results of bone densitometry affect women's decisions about measures to prevent fractures and to determine whether labeling women as having below-normal bone density has adverse effects. DESIGN: Mail survey of a random sample of women. SETTING: Four community hospitals in the San Francisco Bay area. PATIENTS: A total of 261 women (response rate, 81.3%) who had undergone bone densitometry. MEASUREMENTS: Bone densitometry and self-report of changes in attitude and behaviors. RESULTS: Fifty-three percent of the women reported that their first bone density measurements were below normal, and 44% said that they were diagnosed as having osteoporosis on the basis of their test results. Women who reported that their bone density measurements were below normal were much more likely than women with normal results to begin some type of measure to prevent fractures (94% compared with 56%; P less than 0.01), to start hormone therapy (38% compared with 8%; P less than 0.01), and to take precautions to avoid falling (50% compared with 9%; P less than 0.01). Women reporting low bone density, however, also became more fearful of falling (38% compared with 2%; P less than 0.01) and limited their activities to avoid falling (24% compared with 2%; P less than 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The results of bone densitometry substantially influence women's decisions about beginning estrogen replacement therapy and other preventive measures for osteoporotic fractures. The potential effects of labeling a woman as having below-normal bone density need to be considered before densitometry is widely used for unselective screening of women.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To describe how the results of bone densitometry affect women's decisions about measures to prevent fractures and to determine whether labeling women as having below-normal bone density has adverse effects. DESIGN: Mail survey of a random sample of women. SETTING: Four community hospitals in the San Francisco Bay area. PATIENTS: A total of 261 women (response rate, 81.3%) who had undergone bone densitometry. MEASUREMENTS: Bone densitometry and self-report of changes in attitude and behaviors. RESULTS: Fifty-three percent of the women reported that their first bone density measurements were below normal, and 44% said that they were diagnosed as having osteoporosis on the basis of their test results. Women who reported that their bone density measurements were below normal were much more likely than women with normal results to begin some type of measure to prevent fractures (94% compared with 56%; P less than 0.01), to start hormone therapy (38% compared with 8%; P less than 0.01), and to take precautions to avoid falling (50% compared with 9%; P less than 0.01). Women reporting low bone density, however, also became more fearful of falling (38% compared with 2%; P less than 0.01) and limited their activities to avoid falling (24% compared with 2%; P less than 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The results of bone densitometry substantially influence women's decisions about beginning estrogen replacement therapy and other preventive measures for osteoporotic fractures. The potential effects of labeling a woman as having below-normal bone density need to be considered before densitometry is widely used for unselective screening of women.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 185 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe how the results of bone densitometry affect women's decisions about measures to prevent fractures and to determine whether labeling women as having below-normal bone density has adverse effects. DESIGN: Mail survey of a random sample of women. SETTING: Four community hospitals in the San Francisco Bay area. PATIENTS: A total of 261 women (response rate, 81.3%) who had undergone bone densitometry. MEASUREMENTS: Bone densitometry and self-report of changes in attitude and behaviors. RESULTS: Fifty-three percent of the women reported that their first bone density measurements were below normal, and 44% said that they were diagnosed as having osteoporosis on the basis of their test results. Women who reported that their bone density measurements were below normal were much more likely than women with normal results to begin some type of measure to prevent fractures (94% compared with 56%; P less than 0.01), to start hormone therapy (38% compared with 8%; P less than 0.01), and to take precautions to avoid falling (50% compared with 9%; P less than 0.01). Women reporting low bone density, however, also became more fearful of falling (38% compared with 2%; P less than 0.01) and limited their activities to avoid falling (24% compared with 2%; P less than 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The results of bone densitometry substantially influence women's decisions about beginning estrogen replacement therapy and other preventive measures for osteoporotic fractures. The potential effects of labeling a woman as having below-normal bone density need to be considered before densitometry is widely used for unselective screening of women.

Key concepts: Densitometry, Medicine, Osteoporosis, Bone density, Affect (linguistics), Internal medicine, Linguistics, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Results of Bone Densitometry Affect Women's Decisions about Taking Measures To Prevent Fractures — Research Paper | ScholarLens