2012Physical & Occupational Therapy In GeriatricsRequires access

Comparison of “Less Affected Limb” Reaching Kinematics in Individuals with Chronic Stroke and Healthy Age-Matched Controls

Margaret Finley, Stephanie A. Combs, Kristin J. Carnahan, Sarah Peacock, Ashley Van Buskirk

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare kinematics of the limbs during reaching tasks with trunk restraint in persons with chronic stroke to a control group without impairment. Thirty individuals participated (chronic arm impairment from stroke, n = 15, healthy adults, n = 15). Three-dimensional kinematic analysis of the upper extremities was collected during reaching with trunk restraint (self-selected and fast velocities, ipsilateral and contralateral target locations). Data were analyzed with t-tests (p ≤ .025) and effect sizes. Less affected limb showed significant differences compared to the control group in variables at faster speed conditions with medium-large effect sizes across target locations. The less affected upper extremity adapts differently when reaching with trunk restraint compared to persons without stroke. These findings support the idea that there is not a “nonparetic” limb following a stroke, indicating that bilateral assessments and training should be incorporated into rehabilitation programs at the chronic stage of recovery.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of this study was to compare kinematics of the limbs during reaching tasks with trunk restraint in persons with chronic stroke to a control group without impairment. Thirty individuals participated (chronic arm impairment from stroke, n = 15, healthy adults, n = 15). Three-dimensional kinematic analysis of the upper extremities was collected during reaching with trunk restraint (self-selected and fast velocities, ipsilateral and contralateral target locations). Data were analyzed with t-tests (p ≤ .025) and effect sizes. Less affected limb showed significant differences compared to the control group in variables at faster speed conditions with medium-large effect sizes across target locations. The less affected upper extremity adapts differently when reaching with trunk restraint compared to persons without stroke. These findings support the idea that there is not a “nonparetic” limb following a stroke, indicating that bilateral assessments and training should be incorporated into rehabilitation programs at the chronic stage of recovery.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare kinematics of the limbs during reaching tasks with trunk restraint in persons with chronic stroke to a control group without impairment. Thirty individuals participated (chronic arm impairment from stroke, n = 15, healthy adults, n = 15). Three-dimensional kinematic analysis of the upper extremities was collected during reaching with trunk restraint (self-selected and fast velocities, ipsilateral and contralateral target locations). Data were analyzed with t-tests (p ≤ .025) and effect sizes. Less affected limb showed significant differences compared to the control group in variables at faster speed conditions with medium-large effect sizes across target locations. The less affected upper extremity adapts differently when reaching with trunk restraint compared to persons without stroke. These findings support the idea that there is not a “nonparetic” limb following a stroke, indicating that bilateral assessments and training should be incorporated into rehabilitation programs at the chronic stage of recovery.

Key concepts: Trunk, Chronic stroke, Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Stroke (engine), Rehabilitation, Medicine, Kinematics, Upper limb

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of “Less Affected Limb” Reaching Kinematics in Individuals with Chronic Stroke and Healthy Age-Matched Controls — Research Paper | ScholarLens